Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Ole Nomann Thomsen
Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled: Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is current): perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if (/BAYES/);} } print $b/$n,\n; {' current (I promise it's not a rootkit :-) I get: 0.710109622411693 I

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread jdow
1 {^_^}On 10 weeks of mail logs 1. (You have something sincerely broken.) - Original Message - From: Ole Nomann Thomsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled: Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Patrick Sneyers
0.998502994011976 Op 3-feb-06, om 10:27 heeft Ole Nomann Thomsen het volgende geschreven: Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled: Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is current): perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Chris Lear
* Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote (03/02/06 09:27): Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled: Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is current): perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if (/BAYES/);} } print $b/$n,\n; {' current (I promise

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Steven Stern
Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote: Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled: Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is current): perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if (/BAYES/);} } print $b/$n,\n; {' current (I promise it's not a rootkit :-) I

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Matt Kettler
Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote: Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled: Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is current): perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if (/BAYES/);} } print $b/$n,\n; {' current (I promise it's not a rootkit

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Ruben Cardenal
1 -Ruben El vie, 03-02-2006 a las 10:27 +0100, Ole Nomann Thomsen escribi: Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled: Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is current): perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if (/BAYES/);} } print

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Nicklas B. Westerlund
Ruben Cardenal wrote: 1 here too. 1. - Nick.

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Ole Nomann Thomsen
Thanks Matt, Ed, Ruben, Nicklas, Patrick, jdow, Chis et.al. for all the replies, you can stop sending them now, unless you get far below one. At least I now know for sure that I'm stumped :-) For the record: I have no bayes_ignore anywhere, and I don't believe I have missed something in my

RE: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Bowie Bailey
Ole Nomann Thomsen wrote: Hi, can I ask a small favor from some of you running SA with Bayes enabled: Please run the following perl-oneliner on your SA-log (mine is current): perl -ne 'if (/result:/) {$n++; $b++ if (/BAYES/);} } print $b/$n,\n; {' current (I promise it's not a rootkit

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread Loren Wilton
Someone else was recently saying (or maybe its even in Bugzilla) that they see Bayes hit sometimes and not others when they think it should. This might be the first indication though that it is hitting randomly on the *same message*. Sounds like it would be worth trying to figure out why.

Re: Could you scan your logs for me?

2006-02-03 Thread jdow
From: Ole Nomann Thomsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Matt, Ed, Ruben, Nicklas, Patrick, jdow, Chis et.al. for all the replies, you can stop sending them now, unless you get far below one. At least I now know for sure that I'm stumped :-) For the record: I have no bayes_ignore anywhere, and I