Re: DKIMWL's dubious methodology.

2019-03-22 Thread RW
On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:45:38 + Paul Stead wrote: > Hi > > bestchoicebrand.net is not and has not been listed on DKIMwl > > Can you clarify who DKIM signed the email? Very likely to be > amazonses.com or Google Apps SMTP? Yes, I misread it, it has DKIM-Signature:

Re: DKIMWL's dubious methodology.

2019-03-22 Thread Paul Stead
Hi bestchoicebrand.net is not and has not been listed on DKIMwl Can you clarify who DKIM signed the email? Very likely to be amazonses.com or Google Apps SMTP? Paul On 22/03/2019, 19:23, "RW" wrote: I got a spam yesterday that hit DKIMWL_WL_MED on the domain bestchoicebrand.net.

Re: DKIMWL's dubious methodology.

2019-03-22 Thread Benny Pedersen
RW skrev den 2019-03-22 20:16: I got a spam yesterday that hit DKIMWL_WL_MED on the domain bestchoicebrand.net. This domain was less that 24 hours old at the time of scanning and has no A record or SPF TXT record. hopefully listnings owners check now, could be listed wl_none ? I don't think a

DKIMWL's dubious methodology.

2019-03-22 Thread RW
I got a spam yesterday that hit DKIMWL_WL_MED on the domain bestchoicebrand.net. This domain was less that 24 hours old at the time of scanning and has no A record or SPF TXT record. I don't think a domain can have any meaningful good reputation in such a short period of time, and IMO a valid SPF