Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2022-12-28 11:44:
Hello everyone,
just FYI, I published the updated rules to have DQS working on SA
4.0.0+ (https://github.com/spamhaus/spamassassin-dqs)
https://github.com/spamhaus/spamassassin-dqs/blob/master/4.0.0%2B/sh.cf
dated Spamhaus's SpamAssassin setup
On 28/12/22 15:15, Henrik K wrote:
Maybe would be even good idea to use something like this:
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::HashBL
else
error: Please activate HashBL plugin in v342.pre
endif
I think I'll just add the ifplugin condition in the two .cf files and
add a note in
And it is even mentioned in the UPGRADE notes:
- The HashBL plugin in 342.pre is now enabled by default.
(sad typo in the filename)
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 04:21:45PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
>
> This was discussed and approved in some of the 4.0.0 bugs. There should be
> no need to revisit
As I say, such is life. It's a minor thing. Any objections to a
comment if it doesn't exist that documents it was enabled by default in
4.0.0 in the 3.4.2 pre file?
On 12/28/2022 9:21 AM, Henrik K wrote:
This was discussed and approved in some of the 4.0.0 bugs. There should be
no need to
This was discussed and approved in some of the 4.0.0 bugs. There should be
no need to revisit it. It still wouldn't make sense to have loadplugin
HashBL in two *.pre files.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 09:18:51AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Wow, as it's enabled in v342.pre, that would imply
Wow, as it's enabled in v342.pre, that would imply it was enabled in
3.4.2. We should not have changed a past pre file for the 4.0.0 release
IMO but added it to the 4.0.0.pre file. Such is life. Should we fix it
for 4.0.1?
On 12/28/2022 9:07 AM, Henrik K wrote:
Just keep in mind that
Henrik K skrev den 2022-12-28 15:06:
Of course it's a bit of a double-edged sword, since with ifplugin the
rules
might silently be ignored. Especially for Gentoo users. ;-)
gentoo users does not use precompiled problems
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 04:06:01PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 01:58:55PM +, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
> > On 28/12/22 14:44, Henrik K wrote:
> >
> > > It is enabled by default for new installs in v342.pre (old users must
> > > enable
> > > it manually). But like with any
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2022-12-28 15:04:
Going further, you might just encapsulate your entire cf file in to
ifplugin checks, one for URIDNSBL and one for HashBL and any other
plugins you need.
bingo
However, both URIDNSBL and HashBL are enabled by default from checking
the source code.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 09:04:09AM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> However, both URIDNSBL and HashBL are enabled by default from checking the
> source code.
Just keep in mind that HashBL is only enabled for fresh 4.0.0 installs, it
wasn't default previously.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 01:58:55PM +, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
> On 28/12/22 14:44, Henrik K wrote:
>
> > It is enabled by default for new installs in v342.pre (old users must enable
> > it manually). But like with any other loadable plugin, one MUST check use
> > "ifplugin" to check that
Going further, you might just encapsulate your entire cf file in to
ifplugin checks, one for URIDNSBL and one for HashBL and any other
plugins you need.
However, both URIDNSBL and HashBL are enabled by default from checking
the source code.
Regards,
KAM
On 12/28/2022 8:58 AM, Riccardo
On 28/12/22 14:44, Henrik K wrote:
It is enabled by default for new installs in v342.pre (old users must enable
it manually). But like with any other loadable plugin, one MUST check use
"ifplugin" to check that it's loaded.
Ok, thanks for the clarification.
Would you then suggest to add also
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2022-12-28 14:48:
And posters should do their homework as well and post information that
shows what is the problem, how to recreate it, and the expected
outcome. Your posts on this thread are borderline nonsensical.
i did, but you did not understand me, sorry for
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2022-12-28 14:44:
On 12/28/2022 8:35 AM, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
Do you have hashbl plugin enabled?
Ah, I thought it was enabled by default in SA 4.0.
You are correct. HashBL is by default enabled in a stock distribution
with v342.pre. That doesn't mean the
On 12/28/2022 8:33 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
I have no idea what the check plugin is. Read your quoted line again.
don't read the source ?,
https://github.com/apache/spamassassin/blob/trunk/rules/v320.pre#L21
My question was: Do you have the Plugin HashBL enabled.
i have in my test only
Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2022-12-28 14:35:
On 28/12/22 14:20, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Do you have hashbl plugin enabled?
Ah, I thought it was enabled by default in SA 4.0.
only check is on --lint testing, if all plugins is default enabled
multiple errors is hidded
hopefully
On 12/28/2022 8:35 AM, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
Do you have hashbl plugin enabled?
Ah, I thought it was enabled by default in SA 4.0.
You are correct. HashBL is by default enabled in a stock distribution
with v342.pre. That doesn't mean the trouble reporter has it enabled.
--
Kevin A.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 01:35:22PM +, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
> On 28/12/22 14:20, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > Do you have hashbl plugin enabled?
> >
> >
> Ah, I thought it was enabled by default in SA 4.0.
It is enabled by default for new installs in v342.pre (old users must enable
it
Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2022-12-28 14:34:
Looks like you didn't replace the DQS key in the template, as it's
outlined in the README.
i will not share my key here
You also have a lot of parsing errors that are not normal (\t should
be a , don't know why your system renders that badly)
On 28/12/22 14:20, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Do you have hashbl plugin enabled?
Ah, I thought it was enabled by default in SA 4.0.
--
Best regards,
Riccardo Alfieri
Spamhaus Technology
https://www.spamhaus.com/
Looks like you didn't replace the DQS key in the template, as it's
outlined in the README.
You also have a lot of parsing errors that are not normal (\t should be
a , don't know why your system renders that badly)
On 28/12/22 14:17, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Dec 28 14:12:09.837 [1461] warn:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2022-12-28 14:24:
I have no idea what the check plugin is. Read your quoted line again.
don't read the source ?,
https://github.com/apache/spamassassin/blob/trunk/rules/v320.pre#L21
i have in my test only this plugin enabled, rest is disabled
rule maintainers
I have no idea what the check plugin is. Read your quoted line again.
On 12/28/2022 8:22 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2022-12-28 14:20:
Do you have hashbl plugin enabled?
read your quoted line again ?
On 12/28/2022 8:17 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
above is with
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2022-12-28 14:20:
Do you have hashbl plugin enabled?
read your quoted line again ?
On 12/28/2022 8:17 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
above is with only check plugin enabled, this should lint without
warnings
Do you have hashbl plugin enabled?
On 12/28/2022 8:17 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
above is with only check plugin enabled, this should lint without
warnings
--
Kevin A. McGrail
kmcgr...@apache.org
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2022-12-28 11:44:
Hello everyone,
just FYI, I published the updated rules to have DQS working on SA
4.0.0+ (https://github.com/spamhaus/spamassassin-dqs)
Thanks to the effort of all SA developers there is no need anymore to
install a dedicated plugin, as all of our
27 matches
Mail list logo
