A quick note,
also these 2 options need to be configured:
local_tests_only 0
skip_rbl_checks 0
Mimedefang for example uses local_tests_only 1 by default.
HTH
Oliver
Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
Hi Chris,
thanks for that tip!
I will use your rule and also I have done this:
Incremented the score o
In this case its my local IP range, is the range where I put "RELAY" in
sendmail's access.
Thanks
Oliver
Benny Pedersen wrote:
newer list non routelble ip as internal networks, exept if internal network is
localhost or your own ip range
--
Oliver Schulze L.
Get my e-mail after a captcha t
David B Funk writes:
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
> > On 8/17/2006 8:24 PM, David B Funk wrote:
> >
> > > Is there some documentation about how those pseudo headers work?
> > > some way to print out their values or debug their usage?
> >
> > You can see them by adding header
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> On 8/17/2006 8:24 PM, David B Funk wrote:
>
> > Is there some documentation about how those pseudo headers work?
> > some way to print out their values or debug their usage?
>
> You can see them by adding headers that display them using the following
> template tags
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> On 8/17/2006 8:24 PM, David B Funk wrote:
>
> > Is there some documentation about how those pseudo headers work?
> > some way to print out their values or debug their usage?
>
> You can see them by adding headers that display them using the followin
On 8/17/2006 8:24 PM, David B Funk wrote:
Is there some documentation about how those pseudo headers work?
some way to print out their values or debug their usage?
You can see them by adding headers that display them using the following
template tags:
_RELAYSTRUSTED_ relays used a
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
> >> Modify the regex so that you can test against the format provided in the
> >> X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted or X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo headers and
> >> anchor it to the beginning.
> >>
> >> Daryl
> >
> > I thought that X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted has a lis
> Is there a way to make that trigger only on the _first_ (most recent)
> received header?
Modify the regex so that you can test against the format provided in the
X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted or X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo headers and
anchor it to the beginning.
Daryl
I thought that X-Spam-Relay
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> John Rudd wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to make that trigger only on the _first_ (most recent)
> > received header?
>
> Modify the regex so that you can test against the format provided in the
> X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted or X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo
On Fri, August 18, 2006 00:15, Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
> Oops, thanks.
> Will uncomment it until I read more info about it.
newer list non routelble ip as internal networks, exept if internal network is
localhost or your own ip range
--
Benny
Oops, thanks.
Will uncomment it until I read more info about it.
Oliver
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Unless the machine running SpamAssassin only knows your MXes by their
private IPs you don't want to use this exact config.
Daryl
--
Oliver Schulze L.
Get my e-mail after a captcha test in: http
Oliver Schulze L. wrote:
And used this option too:
internal_networks 192.168.1.0/24
Unless the machine running SpamAssassin only knows your MXes by their
private IPs you don't want to use this exact config.
Daryl
nal Message-
> From: Oliver Schulze L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 2:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Dealing with spam bots and dialup/dsl spammers
>
>
> HI,
> I'm getting a very high Spam volume lately.
> I not
John Rudd wrote:
Is there a way to make that trigger only on the _first_ (most recent)
received header?
Modify the regex so that you can test against the format provided in the
X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted or X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo headers and
anchor it to the beginning.
Daryl
> Is there a way to make that trigger only on the _first_ (most
> recent)
> received header?
>
Maybe with the MTA.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Schulze L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 2:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Dealing with spam bots and dialup/dsl spammers
>
>
> HI,
> I'm getting a very high Spam vol
On Aug 17, 2006, at 11:38, Chris Santerre wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Schulze L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 2:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Dealing with spam bots and dialup/dsl spammers
>
>
Title: RE: Dealing with spam bots and dialup/dsl spammers
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Schulze L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 2:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Dealing with spam bots and dialup/dsl spam
HI,
I'm getting a very high Spam volume lately.
I noticed that the most common source of spam are dial-up and A/DSL users.
I wonder if there is a test that I can raise the score, when an IP/hostname
send me and email and that IP/hostname is not a MX server for that domain.
Thanks
Oliver
--
Oliv
19 matches
Mail list logo
