On 2021-06-17 17:42, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Does anyone have any tips on how to get mail through Gmail's spam
filters?
if 8 millions users say this mail is spam it surrely is spam :)
hint if recipients say its not spam to them, then it could change, it
does not being controlled by senders,
Dear Bowie,
I'm afraid this really isn't a question for this email list, since it
has nothing to do with SpamAssassin.
However, to not just send you off with nothing: IP reputation plays a
big role for Google. If you're hosted by a provider like OVH, that seems
to serve lots of
This is a bit off-topic, but I'm hoping someone here might have some
suggestions.
We are having a problem getting mail to Gmail users. It almost always ends up in
their spam folder. I have set up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. The mail-tester.com email
test gives a 10/10 for the test emails I have
John Hardin skrev den 2018-10-05 19:45:
It looks like Google is trying to kill off gmail-ab...@google.com
again.
abuse@ ignorants ?
Folks:
It looks like Google is trying to kill off gmail-ab...@google.com again.
Does anybody have a gmail abuse mailbox address that actually works (i.e.
that Google actually reads, in addition to merely being deliverable)?
A webform is *not* an acceptable alternative.
"Don't Be Evil." Bah.
Am 19.05.2016 um 17:44 schrieb Joseph Brennan:
Reindl Harald wrote:
"doing those best" must be the reason for a testing-SPF instead "-all"
come on..
Remember that the DMARC people changed Internet Message Format so that
"From:" no longer shows the person who
Reindl Harald wrote:
> "doing those best" must be the reason for a testing-SPF instead "-all"
> come on..
Remember that the DMARC people changed Internet Message Format so that
"From:" no longer shows the person who wrote the message but must "align"
with the mail
Am 18.05.2016 um 20:03 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
On May 18, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
Am 18.05.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Emiliano Vazquez:
El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to
> On May 18, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 18.05.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Emiliano Vazquez:
>> El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió:
>>>> Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to
On 5/18/2016 11:10 AM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
On Thu May 19 00:00:31 2016, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote:
As far as i know, they are doing those best to reduce spam by DMARC.
DMARC is used to prevent incomming spam, not outgoing.
Well to be more specific, DMARC allows forgeries to be aggressively
Am 18.05.2016 um 17:00 schrieb Byung-Hee HWANG:
On 2016년 5월 18일 오후 10시 6분 28초 GMT+09:00, Reindl Harald
wrote:
not usually but that's not the point - the point is how they behave
when
you report spreaded phising over different accounts reaching a lot of
your customers
On Thu May 19 00:00:31 2016, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote:
> As far as i know, they are doing those best to reduce spam by DMARC.
DMARC is used to prevent incomming spam, not outgoing.
--
alarig
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
El 18/05/16 a las 10:06, Reindl Harald escribió:
not usually but that's not the point - the point is how they behave
when you report spreaded phising over different accounts reaching a
lot of your customers and don't change the fact that a large part of
junk making it to SA at all comes from
On 2016년 5월 18일 오후 10시 6분 28초 GMT+09:00, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>
wrote:
>
>
>Am 18.05.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Emiliano Vazquez:
>> El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió:
>>>> Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to goog
Am 18.05.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Emiliano Vazquez:
El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for
reporting?
ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your
network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?)
HI
El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for
reporting?
ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your
network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?)
HI guys.
Google only let you send 300 e-mails per
Am 18.05.2016 um 09:32 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
Am 17.05.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for
reporting?
ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered
Am 17.05.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for
reporting?
ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your
network by *.google.com host, wasn't
Am 17.05.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for
reporting?
ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your
network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?)
and you
On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting?
ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your
network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting?
Theoretically <gmail-ab...@google.com>
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting?
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
Joseph Brennan wrote:
But-- how do you
count consecutive lines of raw /^=0A=$/ with the tool we are using?
Not counting, but triggering on 5 or more:
fullFRUKT_EMPTY_QP /\r?\n(?:=0A=\r?\n){5}/s
(I'm not a rule guru, so it wouldn't suprise me if there are
better ways.)
Regards
/Jonas
http://www.nabble.com/file/p17876019/pharmaspam.txt pharmaspam.txt
This one is very distinctive, with all those lines of just =0A=
(encoded newline). I've seen it many times. But-- how do you
count consecutive lines of raw /^=0A=$/ with the tool we are using?
Joseph Brennan
Columbia
omehegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like Hotmail and Gmail's captcha has been broken. I'm getting spam
using their domains as return addresses, and the messages pass SPF. I assume
there are other people getting these. I've attached two - the second one
doesn't even seem to be
:
http://www.nabble.com/A-few-rules-to-catch-current-gmail-spam-tp17590682p17590682.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very
lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.
headers
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail2.adventureaquarium.com ([10.0.0.205]) by
MAIL-I.adventureaquarium.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very
lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.
headers
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail2.adventureaquarium.com ([10.0.0.205]) by
MAIL-I.adventureaquarium.com with
BTW,
email coming from Gmail servers (including valid one) is already being blocked
by several real time blacklists (RBLs)
On 6/9/06, Jason Staudenmayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very
lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.
On 9 Jun 2006, at 13:56, Jason Staudenmayer wrote:
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very
lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.
It's _not from_ GMail.
snip
Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.4) (66.148.73.132)
by mail2.adventureaquarium.com with
I see ... I'll have to see why my qmail didn't drop it for those address
issues.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Jamie L. Penman-Smithson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:26 AM
To: Jason Staudenmayer
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Gmail spam
: RE: Gmail spam
I see ... I'll have to see why my qmail didn't drop it for those address
issues.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Jamie L. Penman-Smithson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:26 AM
To: Jason Staudenmayer
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re
I think I found it, I missed the '.' in my helocheck setting.
-Original Message-
From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:45 AM
To: Jason Staudenmayer; Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Gmail spam
Don't know
...
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very
lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.
headers
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail2.adventureaquarium.com ([10.0.0.205]) by
MAIL-I.adventureaquarium.com with Microsoft
| If you apply the needed
| 27,000 patches to qmail, you can actually get it to refuse garbage
| HELO/EHLO arguments like the '192.168.0.4' that is came in with (or
| client hosts with no rDNS, etc.); Or you could update to a MTA which
| is supported by its author(s) still.
LMAO,
Well said.
Off hand you could not convince me that this message ever got near
gmail servers.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Jason Staudenmayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very
lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.
headers
Microsoft
Repeat - it NEVER WENT NEAR gmail. That part is pure forgery.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: Jason Staudenmayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see ... I'll have to see why my qmail didn't drop it for those address
issues.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
37 matches
Mail list logo