Re: Gmail spam filters

2021-06-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-06-17 17:42, Bowie Bailey wrote: Does anyone have any tips on how to get mail through Gmail's spam filters? if 8 millions users say this mail is spam it surrely is spam :) hint if recipients say its not spam to them, then it could change, it does not being controlled by senders,

Re: Gmail spam filters

2021-06-17 Thread Bert Van de Poel
Dear Bowie, I'm afraid this really isn't a question for this email list, since it has nothing to do with SpamAssassin. However, to not just send you off with nothing: IP reputation plays a big role for Google. If you're hosted by a provider like OVH, that seems to serve lots of

Gmail spam filters

2021-06-17 Thread Bowie Bailey
This is a bit off-topic, but I'm hoping someone here might have some suggestions. We are having a problem getting mail to Gmail users.  It almost always ends up in their spam folder.  I have set up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC.  The mail-tester.com email test gives a 10/10 for the test emails I have

Re: Reporting gmail spam/fraud/phishing

2018-10-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
John Hardin skrev den 2018-10-05 19:45: It looks like Google is trying to kill off gmail-ab...@google.com again. abuse@ ignorants ?

Reporting gmail spam/fraud/phishing

2018-10-05 Thread John Hardin
Folks: It looks like Google is trying to kill off gmail-ab...@google.com again. Does anybody have a gmail abuse mailbox address that actually works (i.e. that Google actually reads, in addition to merely being deliverable)? A webform is *not* an acceptable alternative. "Don't Be Evil." Bah.

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-19 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 19.05.2016 um 17:44 schrieb Joseph Brennan: Reindl Harald wrote: "doing those best" must be the reason for a testing-SPF instead "-all" come on.. Remember that the DMARC people changed Internet Message Format so that "From:" no longer shows the person who

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-19 Thread Joseph Brennan
Reindl Harald wrote: > "doing those best" must be the reason for a testing-SPF instead "-all" > come on.. Remember that the DMARC people changed Internet Message Format so that "From:" no longer shows the person who wrote the message but must "align" with the mail

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.05.2016 um 20:03 schrieb Charles Sprickman: On May 18, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: Am 18.05.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Emiliano Vazquez: El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió: Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Charles Sprickman
> On May 18, 2016, at 9:06 AM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > > Am 18.05.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Emiliano Vazquez: >> El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió: >>>> Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Joe Quinn
On 5/18/2016 11:10 AM, Alarig Le Lay wrote: On Thu May 19 00:00:31 2016, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote: As far as i know, they are doing those best to reduce spam by DMARC. DMARC is used to prevent incomming spam, not outgoing. Well to be more specific, DMARC allows forgeries to be aggressively

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.05.2016 um 17:00 schrieb Byung-Hee HWANG: On 2016년 5월 18일 오후 10시 6분 28초 GMT+09:00, Reindl Harald wrote: not usually but that's not the point - the point is how they behave when you report spreaded phising over different accounts reaching a lot of your customers

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Alarig Le Lay
On Thu May 19 00:00:31 2016, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote: > As far as i know, they are doing those best to reduce spam by DMARC. DMARC is used to prevent incomming spam, not outgoing. -- alarig signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Emiliano Vazquez
El 18/05/16 a las 10:06, Reindl Harald escribió: not usually but that's not the point - the point is how they behave when you report spreaded phising over different accounts reaching a lot of your customers and don't change the fact that a large part of junk making it to SA at all comes from

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread 황병희
On 2016년 5월 18일 오후 10시 6분 28초 GMT+09:00, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > >Am 18.05.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Emiliano Vazquez: >> El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió: >>>> Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to goog

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.05.2016 um 15:00 schrieb Emiliano Vazquez: El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió: Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting? ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?) HI

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Emiliano Vazquez
El 18/05/16 a las 05:44, Reindl Harald escribió: Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting? ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?) HI guys. Google only let you send 300 e-mails per

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.05.2016 um 09:32 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: Am 17.05.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote: Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting? ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-18 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Am 17.05.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote: Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting? ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your network by *.google.com host, wasn't

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.05.2016 um 20:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote: Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting? ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?) and you

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 17.05.16 09:10, Marc Perkel wrote: Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting? ab...@google.com should be the address (the mail was delivered to your network by *.google.com host, wasn't it?) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http

Re: Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-17 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Marc Perkel wrote: Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting? Theoretically <gmail-ab...@google.com> -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.orgFALaholic #11174 pgpk -

Reporting gmail spam to Google

2016-05-17 Thread Marc Perkel
Is there any address that I can forward gmail spam to google for reporting? -- Marc Perkel - Sales/Support supp...@junkemailfilter.com http://www.junkemailfilter.com Junk Email Filter dot com 415-992-3400

Re: Hotmail and Gmail spam getting through

2008-06-18 Thread Jonas Eckerman
Joseph Brennan wrote: But-- how do you count consecutive lines of raw /^=0A=$/ with the tool we are using? Not counting, but triggering on 5 or more: fullFRUKT_EMPTY_QP /\r?\n(?:=0A=\r?\n){5}/s (I'm not a rule guru, so it wouldn't suprise me if there are better ways.) Regards /Jonas

Re: Hotmail and Gmail spam getting through

2008-06-17 Thread Joseph Brennan
http://www.nabble.com/file/p17876019/pharmaspam.txt pharmaspam.txt This one is very distinctive, with all those lines of just =0A= (encoded newline). I've seen it many times. But-- how do you count consecutive lines of raw /^=0A=$/ with the tool we are using? Joseph Brennan Columbia

Re: Hotmail and Gmail spam getting through

2008-06-16 Thread Sahil Tandon
omehegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like Hotmail and Gmail's captcha has been broken. I'm getting spam using their domains as return addresses, and the messages pass SPF. I assume there are other people getting these. I've attached two - the second one doesn't even seem to be

A few rules to catch current gmail spam

2008-06-01 Thread OliverScott
: http://www.nabble.com/A-few-rules-to-catch-current-gmail-spam-tp17590682p17590682.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread Jason Staudenmayer
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison. headers Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mail2.adventureaquarium.com ([10.0.0.205]) by MAIL-I.adventureaquarium.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);

Re: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread Rick Macdougall
Jason Staudenmayer wrote: Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison. headers Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mail2.adventureaquarium.com ([10.0.0.205]) by MAIL-I.adventureaquarium.com with

Re: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread Alejandro Lengua
BTW, email coming from Gmail servers (including valid one) is already being blocked by several real time blacklists (RBLs) On 6/9/06, Jason Staudenmayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.

Re: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
On 9 Jun 2006, at 13:56, Jason Staudenmayer wrote: Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison. It's _not from_ GMail. snip Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.4) (66.148.73.132) by mail2.adventureaquarium.com with

RE: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread Jason Staudenmayer
I see ... I'll have to see why my qmail didn't drop it for those address issues. Thanks -Original Message- From: Jamie L. Penman-Smithson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:26 AM To: Jason Staudenmayer Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Gmail spam

RE: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread Sietse van Zanen
: RE: Gmail spam I see ... I'll have to see why my qmail didn't drop it for those address issues. Thanks -Original Message- From: Jamie L. Penman-Smithson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:26 AM To: Jason Staudenmayer Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re

RE: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread Jason Staudenmayer
I think I found it, I missed the '.' in my helocheck setting. -Original Message- From: Sietse van Zanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 9:45 AM To: Jason Staudenmayer; Jamie L. Penman-Smithson Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Gmail spam Don't know

Re: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread List Mail User
... Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison. headers Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mail2.adventureaquarium.com ([10.0.0.205]) by MAIL-I.adventureaquarium.com with Microsoft

Re: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread qqqq
| If you apply the needed | 27,000 patches to qmail, you can actually get it to refuse garbage | HELO/EHLO arguments like the '192.168.0.4' that is came in with (or | client hosts with no rDNS, etc.); Or you could update to a MTA which | is supported by its author(s) still. LMAO, Well said.

Re: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread jdow
Off hand you could not convince me that this message ever got near gmail servers. {^_^} - Original Message - From: Jason Staudenmayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison. headers Microsoft

Re: Gmail spam

2006-06-09 Thread jdow
Repeat - it NEVER WENT NEAR gmail. That part is pure forgery. {^_^} - Original Message - From: Jason Staudenmayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] I see ... I'll have to see why my qmail didn't drop it for those address issues. Thanks -Original Message- From: Jamie L. Penman-Smithson