On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 17:03 +0200, arni wrote:
> Marc Perkel schrieb:
> >
> > That doesn't answer his question though. He didn't ask for your
> > opinion about if he needed it. If the rules were working for him he
> > wouldn't be asking for help. When someone asks a question telling
> > them they
Matt schrieb:
I have Spamassassin setup to whitelist all my own IP pools. Do I need
to do anything else?
Matt
make sure that anything that is an MX for x@.com is in
your internal_networks
arni
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/
docs inside the archive - botnet is really one of the most effective
plugins i use these days (make sure you set your internal nets properly
I have Spamassassin setup to whitelist all my own IP pools. Do I need
to do anything else?
Matt
otherwise
Matt schrieb:
together with a decent bayes or 1 or 2 more rules already does the
job and
Where do I get the botnet plugin(prefer rpm) and how do I make
Spamassassin use it?
Matt
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/
docs inside the archive - botnet is really one of the most effective
together with a decent bayes or 1 or 2 more rules already does the job and
Where do I get the botnet plugin(prefer rpm) and how do I make
Spamassassin use it?
Matt
Marc Perkel schrieb:
Actually the fastest way to get rid of stoc/botnet spam is with fake
MX records.
fake 10
real 20
fake 30
fake 40
I dont like the idea of making life harder for ham (forcing a properly
working mailserver to make at least 2 connections) acompanied with the
same delays as
arni wrote:
Marc Perkel schrieb:
That doesn't answer his question though. He didn't ask for your
opinion about if he needed it. If the rules were working for him he
wouldn't be asking for help. When someone asks a question telling
them they don't need it is generally the wrong answer and a
Marc Perkel schrieb:
That doesn't answer his question though. He didn't ask for your
opinion about if he needed it. If the rules were working for him he
wouldn't be asking for help. When someone asks a question telling them
they don't need it is generally the wrong answer and a waste of time.
arni wrote:
Suhas Ingale schrieb:
Can someone help me writing rules to catch below content spam?
* 5.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
* 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
* 5.
Suhas Ingale schrieb:
Can someone help me writing rules to catch below content spam?
* 5.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
* 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
* 5.0 BOTNET Relay
10 matches
Mail list logo
