Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi writes:
On 14.4.2010 18:57, yongke wrote:
Well, we send emails on behalf of clients, and so we are trying catch
phishing spam before they are sent out. Since the email aren't sent yet, we
had to generate a mock email for SA. The header in the example is what
On fre 16 apr 2010 15:19:59 CEST, John Hardin wrote
Fix your glue to bypass SA on list-id and received.
when i need it i will, maillists that talk about spam also have ham so
not a big problem for me to not fix it :=)
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On ons 14 apr 2010 23:28:38 CEST, John Hardin wrote
Please do not post spammy mail to the list (it poisons our Bayes
with spammy tokens with hammy score).
If you're running SA list emails through SA you deserve what you get. :)
for sa 3.3.2 bayes_ignore_on_dkim_valid ? :)
bayes_ignore_to
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 14 apr 2010 23:28:38 CEST, John Hardin wrote
Please do not post spammy mail to the list (it poisons our Bayes with
spammy tokens with hammy score).
If you're running SA list emails through SA you deserve what you get. :)
for sa 3.3.2
/How-do-I-filter-out-phishing-email--tp28243762p28243762.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 14.4.2010 17:54, yongke wrote:
Hi guys
Is there anyway to filter out phishing emails using spam assassin? My
current test email wasn't blocked and SA had a score 0f 0:
You sample was not a real email with all headers, or so it looked.
However, I sent to my SA, and here is the
yongke wrote:
Hi guys
Is there anyway to filter out phishing emails using spam assassin?
My current test email wasn't blocked and SA had a score 0f 0:
[ Wire transfer scam email ]
This is a fairly innocuous email. There is not much there to key on.
You could try adding rules for things
On 14.4.2010 17:54, yongke wrote:
Hi guys
Is there anyway to filter out phishing emails using spam assassin? My
current test email wasn't blocked and SA had a score 0f 0:
Please do not post spammy mail to the list (it poisons our Bayes with
spammy tokens with hammy score).
Post the
and goes click, click?
A:A ball point carrot.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-do-I-filter-out-phishing-email--tp28243762p28244615.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-do-I-filter-out-phishing-email--tp28243762p28244624.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 14.4.2010 18:57, yongke wrote:
Well, we send emails on behalf of clients, and so we are trying catch
phishing spam before they are sent out. Since the email aren't sent yet, we
had to generate a mock email for SA. The header in the example is what we
THINK the headers will be when they
Quoting Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi:
Please do not post spammy mail to the list (it poisons our Bayes with
spammy tokens with hammy score).
Why are you scanning messages to the SA list? I do not for your reasoning.
/
You can do very well in speculation where land or anything to do with dirt
is concerned.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-do-I-filter-out-phishing-email--tp28243762p28245364.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://old.nabble.com/How-do-I-filter-out-phishing-email--tp28243762p28245435.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Quoting Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi:
On 14.4.2010 19:57, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
Quoting Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi:
Please do not post spammy mail to the list (it poisons our Bayes with
spammy tokens with hammy score).
Why are you scanning messages to the SA list? I do not for
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-do-I-filter-out-phishing-email--tp28243762p28246329.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 11:18 -0700, yongke wrote:
I installed all the channels in your post but I still get the same score! Is
there anything else I can do?
Are you running with compiled rules? Then you need to recompile them.
Are you running a daemonized spamd or amavisd instance? You will
rules
The commands I used are:
[...]
sa-update --channelfile sa-update-channels.txt --gpgkeyfile
sa-update-keys.txt
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX
www.austinenergy.com
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/How-do-I-filter-out-phishing
On 14.4.2010 21:38, yongke wrote:
I don't think I am running compiled rules as I haven't changed any rules... I
just used that channel thing. I have also restarted SA using the following
command:
sudo /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
Still the same result :(
Clueless here, can't
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Please do not post spammy mail to the list (it poisons our Bayes with
spammy tokens with hammy score).
If you're running SA list emails through SA you deserve what you get. :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
Quoting Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi:
On 14.4.2010 19:57, d.h...@yournetplus.com wrote:
Quoting Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi:
Please do not post spammy mail to the list (it poisons our Bayes
with spammy tokens with hammy score).
On 15.4.2010 0:32, John Hardin wrote:
A mailing list about spam detection shouldn't discuss actual samples of
spam to detect?
Of course it should.
The primary reason for posting samples to pastebin et all is to prevent
the mangling that sending them through the mail will inevitably
Still the same result :(
Clueless here, can't figure out anything...
Jari, it's okay. It'll get better. Is there someone you can talk to about that?
:-)
Best,
Alex
23 matches
Mail list logo
