John Thompson writes:
On 2006-10-16, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What need to be done with messages that are spam is to only learn the
headers and not the body of the message. What needs to be done is some
detection of deliberate bayes poisoning and removal of the poison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:16:19 -0400 (EDT), Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Mon, October 16, 2006 3:07 pm, Marc Perkel said:
What need to be done with messages that are spam is to only learn the
headers and not the body of the message. What needs to be
On 2006-10-16, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What need to be done with messages that are spam is to only learn the
headers and not the body of the message. What needs to be done is some
detection of deliberate bayes poisoning and removal of the poison before
larning.
Does Bayes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My apologies if this question has already been discussed here. I have a
feeling it was but I could not find anything in archives.
Question:
Is there a way to disable autolearn if the spam triggers FUZZY_OCR?
These spams usually contain lots of
My apologies if this question has already been discussed here. I have a
feeling it was but I could not find anything in archives.
Question:
Is there a way to disable autolearn if the spam triggers FUZZY_OCR?
These spams usually contain lots of legitimately looking text and I worry
about
-Original Message-
From: Giampaolo Tomassoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 5:26 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: R: How to disable autolearn for FuzzyOcr?
My apologies if this question has already been discussed here. I
have a
feeling
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:46:17 -0700, Chandler, Jay wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Giampaolo Tomassoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 5:26 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: R: How to disable autolearn
I think what the original poster was asking was how to make thegibberish bodies not get Bayes scanned, so as to not pollute the
database with text that isn't spammy.Exactly my point.Slightly off topic here, but I have a dumb question. If you get a message with obvious bayes poison, what *should*
D.J. wrote:
I think what the original poster was asking was how to make the
gibberish bodies not get Bayes scanned, so as to not pollute the
database with text that isn't spammy.
Exactly my point.
Slightly off topic here, but I have a dumb question. If you get a
message
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Frank Bures wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:46:17 -0700, Chandler, Jay wrote:
I think what the original poster was asking was how to make the
gibberish bodies not get Bayes scanned, so as to not pollute the
database with text that isn't spammy.
Exactly my point.
Do an
Slightly off topic here, but I have a dumb question.If you get a message with obvious bayes poison, what *should* you do?Do you remove
the poison and classify, or do you just not classify that message?I train it just like you would any other message - especially since manyget autolearned.The
What need to be done with messages that are spam is to only learn the
headers and not the body of the message. What needs to be done is some
detection of deliberate bayes poisoning and removal of the poison before
larning.
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Frank Bures wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:46:17 -0700, Chandler, Jay wrote:
I think what the original poster was asking was how to make the
gibberish bodies not get Bayes scanned, so as to not pollute the
database with
On Mon, October 16, 2006 3:07 pm, Marc Perkel said:
What need to be done with messages that are spam is to only learn the
headers and not the body of the message. What needs to be done is some
detection of deliberate bayes poisoning and removal of the poison before
larning.
In all honesty:
Daniel T. Staal wrote:
On Mon, October 16, 2006 3:07 pm, Marc Perkel said:
What need to be done with messages that are spam is to only learn the
headers and not the body of the message. What needs to be done is some
detection of deliberate bayes poisoning and removal of the
15 matches
Mail list logo
