jdow writes:
From: Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
jdow writes:
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the broken part?
Well, this may not qualify as broken, but I would say it's an
undesirable behavior that, upon
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
jdow writes:
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied
with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the broken part?
Well, this may not qualify as broken, but I would say it's an
undesirable behavior that,
Bret Miller writes:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
jdow writes:
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied
with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the broken part?
Well, this may not qualify as broken, but I would say it's an
Bret Miller writes:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
jdow writes:
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied
with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the broken part?
Well, this may not qualify as broken, but I would
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:14:46AM -0500, Logan Shaw wrote:
What happens if the new set is broken? There's no easy way
to revert to the last known good state.
sa-update lint checks the new files in a separate temp area before
installing them into the real directory. Only if lint succeeds
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:14:46AM -0500, Logan Shaw wrote:
What happens if the new set is broken? There's no easy way
to revert to the last known good state.
sa-update lint checks the new files in a separate temp area before
installing them into the real directory. Only if lint succeeds
I received/responded to this privately before it was also sent to the list, so
paraphrasing below...
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:45:43AM -0700, Bret Miller wrote:
But adding the option to archive will make at least some people more
comfortable with running sa-update. So I added the bz ticket.
Bret Miller wrote:
Bret Miller writes:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
jdow writes:
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied
with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the broken part?
Well, this may not qualify as broken, but I would say it's
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:56:00AM -0400, DAve wrote:
I think a status report would be a good option as well. SA already asks
you for your admins email address at install time. Sending a report of
what happened during the sa-update process would be very, very valuable.
Hrm. I'd say feel
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:56:00AM -0400, DAve wrote:
I think a status report would be a good option as well. SA already asks
you for your admins email address at install time. Sending a report of
what happened during the sa-update process would be very, very valuable.
From: Logan Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
jdow writes:
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the broken part?
Well, this may not qualify as broken, but I would say it's
From: Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow writes:
From: Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is
--On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 3:54 PM -0500 Logan Shaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is purely a philosophical argument, but something seems
wrong about the idea of using a package manager to manage
volatile data files in /var.
The problem is not the use of the package manager but the
--On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:33 PM -0700 jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For about a femto-second, perhaps. There is too much YMMV
involved with the SARE rule sets to make it practical as
an rpm solution.
True, this is the real problem with packaging SARE: There's no clear
separation of
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:33 PM -0700 jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For about a femto-second, perhaps. There is too much YMMV
involved with the SARE rule sets to make it practical as
an rpm solution.
True, this is the real problem
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied
with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the broken part?
Well, this may not qualify as broken, but I would say it's an
undesirable behavior that, upon successful download of the new
set of rules, it
From: Bret Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nor does it make sense to use a tool, even if supplied
with SpamAssassin,
that is broken for performing updates.
what's the broken part?
Well, this may not qualify as broken, but I would say it's an
undesirable behavior that, upon successful
-Original Message-
From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:33 PM
Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
On Wed, August 9, 2006 22:01, Gary Funck wrote:
could be done as a gateway to sa-update, perhaps
providing the updates in other package formats as well.
rpm packages does not install sa-update ?
i know yum, but dont make it the better sa-update :-)
it was worse enogh with rulesdujour
--
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
support as well as a central update facility. This
could be done as a gateway
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Bret Miller wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
support as well as a central update facility. This
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring about 62
sa-update channels (one for each ruleset RDJ manages).
Jim Maul wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring about
62 sa-update channels (one
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:45 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Image spam with inline jpeg image
Possibly. It depends on the overhead involved in setting up
the channels.
Plus, not all
Michael Scheidell wrote:
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possibly. It depends on the overhead involved in setting up the
channels.
Plus, not all of us want ALL 62 files!
Some of the *[0-3] files say to use 70_abcd0.cf , or _1, or_2, or_3.
Would need tome cf file for
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Possibly. It depends on the overhead involved in setting up the
channels.
Plus, not all of us want ALL 62 files!
Some of the *[0-3] files say to use 70_abcd0.cf , or _1, or_2, or_3.
Would need tome
Perhaps it could be as simple as only updating existing rules for your
installation? In other words, you would have to download the CF file and
install it first (but you would do this anyways to test!!!). Then sa-update
could simply parse your rules directory and update rules found there
From: Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without configuring about 62
sa-update channels
On 8/11/2006 12:02 AM, jdow wrote:
From: Jim Maul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bowie Bailey wrote:
It doesn't really matter to me who supports which pieces as long as
they all work.
Someone may be able to fix sa-update so that it can take over from
RDJ, but as of now, that is not possible without
All my rulesets and the LARGO rules are for catching inline png and
inline gif. Now I am getting stock spams with
images like
--=_NextPart_001_000C_01C6BBE8.11C02650--
--=_NextPart_000_000B_01C6BBE8.11BB4450
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=militarism.jpg
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
Ramprasad wrote:
All my rulesets and the LARGO rules are for catching inline png and
inline gif. Now I am getting stock spams with
images like
--=_NextPart_001_000C_01C6BBE8.11C02650--
--=_NextPart_000_000B_01C6BBE8.11BB4450
Content-Type: image/jpeg; name=militarism.jpg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Are you using the updated version OR the one originally posted?
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm#imageinfo
Updates:
- added optimization changes by Theo Van Dinter
- added jpeg support
- added function image_named()
- added function image_size_exact()
- added function image_size_range()
- added function image_to_text_ratio()
- dhawal
image-spam that got a LARGO score
since the install last week, I don't get many of those spams..
Regards
Menno
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Image-spam-with-inline-jpeg-image-tf2079118.html#a5728450
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Menno wrote:
Ramprasad wrote:
But still this mail is getting thru
http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/imagespam.txt
I tested your mail here with the latest imageinfo.pm and it comes through
indeed. The exact same one in .gif (same text, same background)
was detected
though. It was even my
On Wed, August 9, 2006 16:39, Richard wrote:
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to TRUSTED_RULESETS
everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
--
Benny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to TRUSTED_RULESETS
everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
i'm sorry, i don't understand that sentence.
Richard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to TRUSTED_RULESETS
everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
i'm sorry, i don't understand that
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:58:19AM -0700, Richard wrote:
rules_du_jour was done when sa-update did not exists
are you implying that sa-update replaces rules-du-jour?
That depends on what you mean by replaces.
i though sa-update updates the SA distro's bundled rules, but NOT any
additional
- Original Message -
From: Gary Funck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:04 AM
Subject: RE: Image spam with inline jpeg image
Menno wrote:
Ramprasad wrote:
But still this mail is getting thru
http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp
Theo wrote (in part):
sa-update is a generic tool that lets users download
channels (ie: bundles
of rules/plugins) from anywhere that decides to publish them
(requires a
certain setup, etc.) At the moment, the only published
channel that I know
of is updates.spamassassin.org. (all
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
support as well as a central update facility. This
could be done as a gateway to sa-update,
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Gary Funck wrote:
Has anyone considered also supplying new rules in the
form of rpm's available via a yum-compatible repository?
It'd be nice to have the usual versioning and logging
support as well as a central update facility. This
could be done
From: Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's nothing stoping the SARE folks from publishing a single or a
bunch of channels and getting rid of RDJ in favor of sa-update if they
wanted to... There are some benefits either way I suppose, and I'm biased
towards sa-update of course. :|
Um,
From: Gary Funck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Theo wrote (in part):
sa-update is a generic tool that lets users download
channels (ie: bundles
of rules/plugins) from anywhere that decides to publish them
(requires a
certain setup, etc.) At the moment, the only published
channel that I know
of is
46 matches
Mail list logo
