Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-03-01 Thread Jeff Chan
On 3/1/09, Jeff Chan je...@surbl.org wrote: For historical reasons, the SURBL public nameservers were serving individual lists ab, sc, ob and ws in addition to multi. However these individual lists have all been deprecated in favor of multi for several years since multi contains all lists.

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:43 -0800, Jeff Chan wrote: On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote: Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already (3.2.5 used here)? My stats report those: URIBL_JP_SURBL URIBL_AB_SURBL URIBL_SC_SURBL

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote: Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already (3.2.5 used here)? My stats report those: URIBL_JP_SURBL URIBL_AB_SURBL URIBL_SC_SURBL URIBL_OB_SURBL URIBL_WS_SURBL No report

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:38 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote: Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already (3.2.5 used here)? My stats report those: URIBL_JP_SURBL

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread mouss
Gregory P. Ennis a écrit : [snip] Thanks for the response. How can I determine if SURBL is turned on? SURBL is probably turned on. you can run spamassassin with the -D flag. you can also look in SA files to see if it using multi.surbl.org. if using sa-update, look in

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-08 Thread Jeff Chan
On Sunday, February 8, 2009, 2:25:15 PM, mouss mouss wrote: Gregory P. Ennis a écrit : [snip] Thanks for the response. How can I determine if SURBL is turned on? SURBL is probably turned on. you can run spamassassin with the -D flag. you can also look in SA files to see if it using

Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-04 Thread Jeff Chan
For historical reasons, the SURBL public nameservers were serving individual lists ab, sc, ob and ws in addition to multi. However these individual lists have all been deprecated in favor of multi for several years since multi contains all lists. Traffic for the individual lists is relatively

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-04 Thread Andre
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Jeff Chan wrote: For historical reasons, the SURBL public nameservers were serving individual lists ab, sc, ob and ws in addition to multi. However these individual lists have all been deprecated in favor of multi for several years since multi contains all lists.

RE: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-04 Thread Randal, Phil
to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi. On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Jeff Chan wrote: For historical reasons, the SURBL public nameservers were serving individual lists ab, sc, ob and ws in addition to multi. However these individual lists have all been deprecated in favor

Re: Individual SURBL lists to be shut down on public nameservers February 28, 2009. Use multi.

2009-02-04 Thread Jeff Chan
On Wednesday, February 4, 2009, 9:14:58 AM, Andre Andre wrote: Does that require changes to spamassassin or is it using multi already (3.2.5 used here)? My stats report those: URIBL_JP_SURBL URIBL_AB_SURBL URIBL_SC_SURBL URIBL_OB_SURBL URIBL_WS_SURBL No report of multi in there but