At 02:56 15-02-10, Per Jessen wrote:
I went to google mtamark, and came across a few discussions on mailing
lists (e.g. at www.sage.org) as well as an article in iX (German IT
magazine) in 2005. The proposal was certainly discussed quite a bit,
but it's not very clear what then happened. I
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I have to say keep in mind that MTAMark does not tie the spam to a
domain, and MTX does, which makes it easier to track down the spammer,
and blacklist by domain instead of IP.
I'm not quite sure what that means: how does MTX tie spam to a domain?
Regardless,
Per Jessen wrote:
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
(And of course, if this catches on, you'll have to provide RFC style
documentation.)
See Justins posting from two days back:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
On 02/14, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stumpf-dns-mtamark/
Personally I think it is a great idea and anything to help combat the
spam is always a worthwhile effort. Is it possible to resurrect that
proposal and worth with the original authors and perhaps combine
