I have a number of rules that match on the To field, but what to do if the
>To field is missing?
10_hasbase.cf:header__HAS_TOexists:To
define:
metaMISSING_TO !__HAS_TO
>Received: from test.com (wsip-72-214-24-18.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.24.18])
>by
> The problem I'm having is that my To header rules aren't matching because
> there is no To header,
> and I'm otherwise unsure what to match on. The only occurrence of the
> recipient in the entire email
> is in that Received header.
>
> It does match on "ALL", but I think I need to be more
Hi,
>I have a number of rules that match on the To field, but what to do if the
> >To field is missing?
>
> 10_hasbase.cf:header__HAS_TOexists:To
>
> define:
>
> metaMISSING_TO !__HAS_TO
>
> >Received: from test.com (wsip-72-214-24-18.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.24.18])
> >
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022, Loren Wilton wrote:
header __HDRS_MISSP ALL:raw =~ /^(?:Subject|From|To|Reply-To):\S/ism
That rule just says: look at all the raw header data and match if there's
none
of Subject, From, To, Reply-To entries.
IE a really malformed message.
Hum. As I read it, that
On 2022-07-20 at 12:07:04 UTC-0400 (Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:07:04 -0700)
Loren Wilton
is rumored to have said:
>>>
>>> header __HDRS_MISSP ALL:raw =~ /^(?:Subject|From|To|Reply-To):\S/ism
>>
>> That rule just says: look at all the raw header data and match if there's
>> none
>> of Subject, From,
header __HDRS_MISSP ALL:raw =~ /^(?:Subject|From|To|Reply-To):\S/ism
That rule just says: look at all the raw header data and match if there's
none
of Subject, From, To, Reply-To entries.
IE a really malformed message.
Hum. As I read it, that is "headers misspelled" (not "headers missing")
On Wed, 20 Jul 2022, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I have a number of rules that match on the To field, but what to do if the To
field is missing?
Received: from test.com (wsip-72-214-24-18.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.24.18])
by mail01.example.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 12425B9B
for ; Fri, 15
On 20.07.22 09:29, Alex wrote:
I have a number of rules that match on the To field, but what to do if the
To field is missing?
10_hasbase.cf:header__HAS_TOexists:To
define:
metaMISSING_TO !__HAS_TO
Received: from test.com (wsip-72-214-24-18.sd.sd.cox.net
Hi,
I have a number of rules that match on the To field, but what to do if the
To field is missing?
Received: from test.com (wsip-72-214-24-18.sd.sd.cox.net [72.214.24.18])
by mail01.example.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 12425B9B
for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:50:34 -0400 (EDT)
I
