On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Chris Owen wrote:
Reason plays no role here. There is nothing you can say that the troll
won't feed on. Best to just ignore and move on.
(nod)
Seriously--after his performance the last couple of months just ignore
him. Easiest way to make it stop.
(nod again) Now tha
On Nov 30, 2009, at 11:46 AM, Charles Gregory wrote:
> LOL - I shoulda known better than to make a 'reasonable' suggestion.
> Well, at least the subject line is changed. :)
Reason plays no role here. There is nothing you can say that the troll won't
feed on. Best to just ignore and move on
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
You are just as bad Garretson. I have Chris Owen in my killfile and your
reply means I've had to suffer his garbage quoted post. If you do wish
to dance the 'troll' abuse line, go somewhere else with it because
frankly, I find your input rather b
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Chris Owen wrote:
Why anyone replies to this guy about anything is beyond me. Adding him
to a kill file doesn't do much good when you still see the other half of
the "argument".
Most e-mail clients insert a line of the form:
"On (date) (name) (address) wrote:"
So in th
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 12:06 -0500, Matt Garretson wrote:
> Chris Owen wrote:
> > Why anyone replies to this guy about anything is beyond me.
> > Adding him to a kill file doesn't do much good when you still
> > see the other half of the "argument".
>
>
> +1
>
> If you must feed the trolls, ple
Chris Owen wrote:
> Why anyone replies to this guy about anything is beyond me.
> Adding him to a kill file doesn't do much good when you still
> see the other half of the "argument".
+1
If you must feed the trolls, please at least don't quote them.
On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>>> PS. If I were a spammer I would be laughing my ass off at this waste of
>>> time. Every effort spent on fighting each other is less spent on them.
>> Actually, it's reasonable to argue tha
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
PS. If I were a spammer I would be laughing my ass off at this waste of
time. Every effort spent on fighting each other is less spent on them.
Actually, it's reasonable to argue that you are worse - you've just
contributed to an argument that yo
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 10:08 -0500, Charles Gregory wrote:
> PS. If I were a spammer I would be laughing my ass off at this waste of
> time. Every effort spent on fighting each other is less spent on them.
Actually, it's reasonable to argue that you are worse - you've just
contributed to an argum
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
it's funny that you send me private copies for mail that DOES belong to
the list, but you refuse private mail even if it's does NOT belong here.
Well, I figured if you wanted to go on being an ignorant asshole and
keep doing it, I would reply in
10 matches
Mail list logo
