On 29-Nov-2009, at 04:59, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
I'd assume that a big ISP using SA (and wants the best from SA install) would
pay to use the better DNSBLs.
I've found pretty much the opposite; the larger the ISP, the worse job they do
filtering spam for their customers. The only exception is
Martijn Grooten wrote:
- I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and
open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and
unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free;
This doesn't make any sense. You are comparing SA to commercial
On søn 29 nov 2009 12:59:32 CET, Jonas Eckerman wrote
I'd assume that a big ISP using SA (and wants the best from SA
install) would pay to use the better DNSBLs.
ask recipient if a isp does a well good job of stopping spam to ones
inbox, payed dnsbl or not :=)
shared rbl listes is silly,
Martijn Grooten wrote:
All,
a few months back, there was a discussion on this list about the
VBSpam comparative anti-spam tests[1], in which SpamAssassin performed
significantly worse than many commercial products. Now I run these
tests and I believe something was the matter with (the
Alex wrote:
Hi,
- I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and
open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and
unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free;
Do the commercial vendors get to use publically-available DNSBLs like
zen?
All,
a few months back, there was a discussion on this list about the
VBSpam comparative anti-spam tests[1], in which SpamAssassin performed
significantly worse than many commercial products. Now I run these
tests and I believe something was the matter with (the installation
of) SA that made it
Martijn,
I may be missing something here but I went to your website and
you use the terms malware and spam interchangeably.
Now, it may be true that these days in the commercial realm
that the antivirus vendors are all jumping into the anti-spam market
to enhance revenue, but in reality,
Martijn Grooten wrote:
- I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and
open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and
unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free;
I'm not in any way trying to jump on what you're trying to do as I
Hi,
- I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and
open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and
unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free;
Do the commercial vendors get to use publically-available DNSBLs like
zen? If so, and
