Den 2012-03-23 09:02, Per Jessen skrev:
http://files.jessen.ch/proxy.log
log mime type ?
if it ends in txt, mime will let me see it as text without download
into my c drive :)
Am 23.03.2012 09:02, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 22.03.2012 10:19, schrieb Per Jessen:
>> It's also the rate of change that is
>>> interesting - I very rarely see two emails with the same link.
>>>
>>
>> one more indicate for a bright planned campaign
>> what are they t
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 22.03.2012 10:19, schrieb Per Jessen:
> It's also the rate of change that is
>> interesting - I very rarely see two emails with the same link.
>>
>
> one more indicate for a bright planned campaign
> what are they try to push...?
It varies - one link I've just cli
;>>>> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as:
>>>>>>
:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>>>>>> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>>>>>
>>>>>> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as:
>&
Am 22.03.2012 10:30, schrieb xTrade Assessory:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> one more indicate for a bright planned campaign
>> what are they try to push...?
>
>
> I guess that is easy and simple ... the more the merrier
>
> they are smart but we got smarter too and now it is getting harder and
On 03/22/2012 10:19 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 22.03.2012 08:23, schrieb Per Jessen:
Robert Schetterer wrote:
Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> one more indicate for a bright planned campaign
> what are they try to push...?
I guess that is easy and simple ... the more the merrier
they are smart but we got smarter too and now it is getting harder and
harder for "them" so they switch identification as fast as po
his stream of new spamvertized domains :
>>>>>
>>>>> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>>>>>
>>>>> Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as:
>>>>>
>>>>> You should check your status update and se
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 22.03.2012 08:23, schrieb Per Jessen:
>> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>
>>> Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>>> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>>>>
>>>> ht
Am 22.03.2012 09:43, schrieb xTrade Assessory:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> spam often is very recipient related
>> i.e my beloved spambot armee relocated from china/us now to india/brasil
>> during last year , looks like thats trendy
>
>
> regarding BR
>
> we get most from afrinic 41.0 and pak
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> spam often is very recipient related
> i.e my beloved spambot armee relocated from china/us now to india/brasil
> during last year , looks like thats trendy
regarding BR
we get most from afrinic 41.0 and pakistan 182.177, and of course our
own adsl blocks
if you like
Am 22.03.2012 08:23, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
>>> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>>>
>>> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>>>
>>
Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
>> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>>
>> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>>
>> Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as:
>>
>
Am 21.03.2012 09:09, schrieb Per Jessen:
> Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
>
> http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
>
> Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as:
>
> You should check your status update and see if it cha
Has anyone else noticed this stream of new spamvertized domains :
http://files.jessen.ch/list-of-new-domains
Typically accompanied by messages/subject lines such as:
You should check your status update and see if it changed
This method of language learning is super easy.
Please confirm that
Rocketmail isn't new. I've had a rocketmail account since the 1990's.
--Quanah
--On Thursday, June 19, 2008 6:40 PM -0400 Michael Scheidell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As if email from freebie @yahoo.com addresses isn't enough, Yahoo has
now announces two ne
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Rocketmail isn't new. I've had a rocketmail account since the 1990's.
yes, and now you belong to yahoo
read the story.
--
Michael Scheidell, President
Main: 561-999-5000, Office: 561-939-7259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
Winner 2008 Technosium hot co
Michael Scheidell wrote:
[snip]
sharpen up your SA rules, justin: time to watch those rules, including
the 'forged from yahoo' rules.
no spf records. wonder if they will dkim sign them:
$ host -t txt ymail.com
ymail.com has no TXT record
$ host -t txt rocketmail.com
rocketmail.com has no T
As if email from freebie @yahoo.com addresses isn't enough, Yahoo has
now announces two new domains that the freebie spammers can spam from:
ymail.com and rocketmail.com
*SAN FRANCISCO — Yahoo Inc. is offering free e-mail accounts under two
new designations in an effort to attract Web su
mouss wrote:
> Wouldn't this be reinventing /etc/hosts?
No.
The hosts file contained all individual *hosts* a machine needed
to know about, and still contains all hosts a machine needs to
know about without using the DNS.
This database would contain all *domains* that has been used in mail.
Jonas Eckerman wrote:
(The idea below is not mine, someone else (I'm sorry, but I forgot
who) wrote about it here (I think) before.)
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
brand-new domains,
Something that could work for this without the problems inherent in
using whois or registry databases
Quoting Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --On Thursday, September 27, 2007 7:05 PM +0200 Giampaolo Tomassoni
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The only problem is that a spammer could "query" it days before it will
> > bulk send, thereby impairing the effectiveness of such approach.
> >
> >
--On Thursday, September 27, 2007 7:05 PM +0200 Giampaolo Tomassoni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only problem is that a spammer could "query" it days before it will
bulk send, thereby impairing the effectiveness of such approach.
I think we need some "official" data like the domain's creatio
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
The only problem is that a spammer could "query" it days before it will bulk
send, thereby impairing the effectiveness of such approach.
So we check (with DNS) wether a domain MX record exists before
adding it to the database. Something like this:
1: It receives a
> 2. As mentioned above the whois data is sometimes populated *after* the
> domains
> start appearing in spams. Remember that the whois data is still mostly batch
> processed once or twice a day. Many of the TLD zone files (where the DNS
> delegations actually come from) are updated in near real
Quoting Jonas Eckerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (The idea below is not mine, someone else (I'm sorry, but I
> forgot who) wrote about it here (I think) before.)
>
> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
>
> > brand-new domains,
>
> Something that could work for this wi
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Jonas Eckerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: giovedì 27 settembre 2007 18.17
> A: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Oggetto: New domains (was: URIWhois plugin)
>
> (The idea below is not mine, someone else (I'm sorry, but I
&g
(The idea below is not mine, someone else (I'm sorry, but I
forgot who) wrote about it here (I think) before.)
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
brand-new domains,
Something that could work for this without the problems inherent
in using whois or registry databases is to simply check how
30 matches
Mail list logo
