On 04/10/2009 22:16, mouss wrote:
why lastexternal ?
would you expect ham traffic from those IPs? and want to loose deeper
header parsing?
Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for
SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I think everything that can
be caught with it will
Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 04/10/2009 22:16, mouss wrote:
why lastexternal ?
would you expect ham traffic from those IPs? and want to loose deeper
header parsing?
Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for
SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I think everything that can
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:45:40AM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
Mike Cardwell wrote:
I use SpamHaus from SpamAssassin rather than directly from my MTA
mainly because I don't want that mail to avoid the bayes auto-learning.
If I ever find the service running out of cpu cycles, I might consider
On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 14:03 -0500, Robert Braver wrote:
On Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:55:55 PM, RW wrote:
Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for
SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I think everything that can
be caught with it will get caught at the smtp level
SpamHaus announced a new list a couple of days back -
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=646
According to that page it returns results of 127.0.0.3
I just took a quick look at 20_dnsbl_tests.cf and it doesn't seem to
include it yet. Currently we have:
RCVD_IN_SBL - 127.0.0.2
Mike Cardwell wrote:
SpamHaus announced a new list a couple of days back -
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=646
According to that page it returns results of 127.0.0.3
I just took a quick look at 20_dnsbl_tests.cf and it doesn't seem to
include it yet. Currently we have:
Matt Kettler wrote:
SpamHaus announced a new list a couple of days back -
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=646
According to that page it returns results of 127.0.0.3
I just took a quick look at 20_dnsbl_tests.cf and it doesn't seem to
include it yet. Currently we have:
RCVD_IN_SBL
On 4-Oct-2009, at 04:31, Mike Cardwell wrote:
SpamHaus announced a new list a couple of days back -
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=646
According to that page it returns results of 127.0.0.3
I just took a quick look at 20_dnsbl_tests.cf and it doesn't seem to
include it yet.
On 10/4/2009 3:20 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 4-Oct-2009, at 04:31, Mike Cardwell wrote:
SpamHaus announced a new list a couple of days back -
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=646
According to that page it returns results of 127.0.0.3
I just took a quick look at 20_dnsbl_tests.cf and it
On søn 04 okt 2009 12:31:37 CEST, Mike Cardwell wrote
SpamHaus announced a new list a couple of days back -
http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=646
According to that page it returns results of 127.0.0.3
I just took a quick look at 20_dnsbl_tests.cf and it doesn't seem to
include it
On søn 04 okt 2009 15:20:09 CEST, LuKreme wrote
# CSS is the Snowshoe Block List: http://www.spamhaus.org/css/
header RCVD_IN_CSS eval:check_rbl('zen-lastexternal',
'zen.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.3')
you make another dns lookup here compared to what rule i maked :)
--
xpoint
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:53:34 +0200
Yet Another Ninja sa-l...@alexb.ch wrote:
why lastexternal ?
would you expect ham traffic from those IPs? and want to loose deeper
header parsing?
Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for
SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I
On Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:55:55 PM, RW wrote:
R Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for
R SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I think everything that can
R be caught with it will get caught at the smtp level . With SBL you get
R additional deep hits from spammers
On Sunday, October 4, 2009, 1:55:55 PM, RW wrote:
R Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for
R SpamAssassin. With zen being so popular, I think everything that can
R be caught with it will get caught at the smtp level . With SBL you get
R additional deep hits from
RW a écrit :
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:53:34 +0200
Yet Another Ninja sa-l...@alexb.ch wrote:
why lastexternal ?
would you expect ham traffic from those IPs? and want to loose deeper
header parsing?
Right, although I doubt this list is going to be much use for
SpamAssassin. With zen
15 matches
Mail list logo