On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:13:07 -0400,
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
To enable TextCat to flag everything that's not English, in local.pre
I have:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
And in local.cf I have:
ok_languages en
On 27.09.14 22:36, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I have done thi
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:13:07 -0400,
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> To enable TextCat to flag everything that's not English, in local.pre
> I have:
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
> And in local.cf I have:
> ok_languages en
I have done this too, but I live in an English spea
erything that's not English, in local.pre
I have:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat
And in local.cf I have:
ok_languages en
This post was originally going to be asking if anybody wanted to
collaborate on some non-English spam rules. I guess I'll re-consider that
after October.
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 19:59 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Karsten wrote:
> > That's trivial to do with pure HTML, too, no need for funky tricks some
> > MUAs might not understand or render. Oh, and it actually is even
> > trivial to do with the MIME structure and a spammy text/plain payload.
>
>
Karsten wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 13:52 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> > there is another catch, too, for HTML messages -- it's trivial with
> > CSS or javascript
>
> That's trivial to do with pure HTML, too, no need for funky tricks some
> MUAs might not understand or render. Oh, and it actual
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 13:52 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> there is another catch, too, for HTML messages -- it's trivial with
> CSS or javascript
That's trivial to do with pure HTML, too, no need for funky tricks some
MUAs might not understand or render. Oh, and it actually is even
trivial to do w
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 13:04 -0400, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2009, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > The ok_locales setting defaults to all, effectively disabling all
> > CHARSET_FARAWAY rules. It is intended to be set voluntarily to charsets
> > you cannot even decipher, let alone read.
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
The ok_locales setting defaults to all, effectively disabling all
CHARSET_FARAWAY rules. It is intended to be set voluntarily to charsets
you cannot even decipher, let alone read.
Now that I think about it, I would be much happier with a setting
n
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 12:58 +0200, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> > This is not about OpenProtect or their decisions. Actually, there are
> > more than this one sa-update mirror for the SARE rules.
>
> I think you missed my point. The OpenProtect channel adds a bunch of
>
there is another catch, too, for HTML messages -- it's trivial with
CSS or javascript
to "pad" a HTML page with an initial 500KB of innocuous content, then
"overwrite"
that padding with a later chunk of HTML loaded from later in the source.
--j.
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 13:23, Mark Martinec wrote
Jason,
> I wonder: what would be the real downside to "spamc -s 50" actually
> sending the first 50 bytes instead of sending nothing for email >
> 500K? I realise there would be at least one missing MIME end-boundary,
> but it would still pass all the headers and some of the content...
Ye
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
This is not about OpenProtect or their decisions. Actually, there are
more than this one sa-update mirror for the SARE rules.
I think you missed my point. The OpenProtect channel adds a bunch of
SARE rulesets in a single channel. This means that when you use that
c
On 05/20/2009 12:37 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
> The ok_locales setting defaults to all, effectively disabling all
> CHARSET_FARAWAY rules. It is intended to be set voluntarily to charsets
> you cannot even decipher, let alone read.
>
>
Doh! I run a separate instance of SA for my own mail
While I agree with all the good info (snipped) above, and pretty much
said exactly that myself...
> Using the OpenProtect channel means that you (or your admin) have
> decided to trust OpenProtect to decide for you wich rules to add to your
> ruleset. If you find that you don't agree with OpenPr
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 12:01 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I just got a very large Chinese spam (>4M) - I seem to get several of
> these a month. Anyway, while I was fiddling with it I saw the score SA
> gave it when it could actually swallow the whole thing (see below).
>
> As you can s
Jason Haar wrote:
As you can see, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER, and
SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312 (from openprotect rules) all triggered - total of
8.0 points. Sounds good - but of course that's very bad! Doesn't that
mean an actual legitimate Chinese email would *default to a score of
8.0
Hi there
I just got a very large Chinese spam (>4M) - I seem to get several of
these a month. Anyway, while I was fiddling with it I saw the score SA
gave it when it could actually swallow the whole thing (see below).
As you can see, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER, and
SARE_SUB_ENC_
17 matches
Mail list logo
