On Mon, 2 May 2005, Justin Mason wrote:
It might be worthwhile maintaining some kind of spammer tactics
knowledge base, on the wiki maybe?
There's http://www.jgc.org/tsc/ but it's more focussed on textual
obfuscation than low-level tactics.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Finch writes:
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Justin Mason wrote:
It might be worthwhile maintaining some kind of spammer tactics
knowledge base, on the wiki maybe?
There's http://www.jgc.org/tsc/ but it's more focussed on textual
obfuscation
About a month ago, there was a discussion on the list about how spammers
specifically target secondary MX records. After reading I verified
that indeed 99% of the mail that flowed through my store-and-forward
secondary mail server was spam. So, I removed the second MX record
from my DNS
On 5/2/2005 1:48 PM +0200, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
spam going to that server! I wonder if the spammers have cached the
old MX entry
Jup.
Niek
...
About a month ago, there was a discussion on the list about how spammers
specifically target secondary MX records. After reading I verified
that indeed 99% of the mail that flowed through my store-and-forward
secondary mail server was spam. So, I removed the second MX record
from my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Niek writes:
On 5/2/2005 1:48 PM +0200, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
spam going to that server! I wonder if the spammers have cached the
old MX entry
Jup.
BTW I've seen a few discussions recently where people rediscover
(sorry Kevin) these
