On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 09:39 +0100, James Griffin wrote:
> Thu 25.Jul'13 at 1:31:16 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann
> > NOTE: Be careful of using sa-learn in different environments or ways in
> > parallel. For example via the dovecot anti-spam plugin, from a cron job
> > harvesting mbox files, maildir,
Thank you both for those replies. That confirmed exactly what I was looking
for. Very helpful.
Karsten, concerning your note about sa-learn in different environments, I
did a few more tests and it looks like the dovecot antispam plugin does not
make any changes to the e-mail message and sa-learn t
Thu 25.Jul'13 at 1:31:16 +0200, Karsten
Bräckelmann
[ ... ]
> NOTE: Be careful of using sa-learn in different environments or ways in
> parallel. For example via the dovecot anti-spam plugin, from a cron job
> harvesting mbox files, maildir, processed through f
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 01:10 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> The SA 3.3.2 and the current 3.4.0 both contain a code
> that copies stdin to a temporary file in order to make the
> ArchiveIterator happy, which only accepts files or directories.
>
> So the only current advantage of passing a message on
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 10:48 -0500, Kareem Dana wrote:
> I am using SpamAssassin 3.3.2 on FreeBSD 9.1. I'd just like to confirm
> that I can pipe messages to sa-learn. The following commands should do
> the same thing, correct?
>
> # cat spammail | sa-learn --spam
> # sa-learn --spam spammail
Corr
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 17:48:47 Kareem Dana wrote:
> I am using SpamAssassin 3.3.2 on FreeBSD 9.1. I'd just like to confirm that
> I can pipe messages to sa-learn. The following commands should do the same
> thing, correct?
>
> # cat spammail | sa-learn --spam
> # sa-learn --spam spammail
Yes,
I am using SpamAssassin 3.3.2 on FreeBSD 9.1. I'd just like to confirm that
I can pipe messages to sa-learn. The following commands should do the same
thing, correct?
# cat spammail | sa-learn --spam
# sa-learn --spam spammail
I have tested and they appear to be identical, but ultimately I will