Re: Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-05-04 Thread Tom
On 5/3/20 1:16 AM, Bill Cole wrote: > On 30 Apr 2020, at 14:59, Tom Williams wrote: > >> Hi!  I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've >> used it on and off for a number years.  :)   Recently, (within the >> past 6 months or so) I enabled it for email in a shared web hosting

Re: Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-05-03 Thread Bill Cole
On 30 Apr 2020, at 14:59, Tom Williams wrote: Hi!  I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've used it on and off for a number years.  :)   Recently, (within the past 6 months or so) I enabled it for email in a shared web hosting environment (we host with InMotionHosting).

Re: Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-05-02 Thread Tom
Man thanks to those who responded.  I was mainly wondering how the inability to do blacklist checks would impact the overall ability of SpamAssassin to detect spam.  Given the responses, I'll go in a different direction.  I'll move the site to a VPS, where I can have more control over SpamAssassin

Re: Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-05-02 Thread RW
On Sat, 2 May 2020 15:59:27 +0300 Jari Fredriksson wrote: > On 2.5.2020 13.30, Reindl Harald wrote: > > and why don't you just replace /etc/resolv.conf and fire up "chattr > > +i /etc/resolv.conf" like everyone else does for years to keep it > > untouched (that's even a ducomentaed way to prevent

Re: Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-05-02 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 2.5.2020 13.30, Reindl Harald wrote: and why don't you just replace /etc/resolv.conf and fire up "chattr +i /etc/resolv.conf" like everyone else does for years to keep it untouched (that's even a ducomentaed way to prevent it overwritten by dhcp clients) there is no point using a shared

Re: Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-05-02 Thread Jari Fredriksson
Still! Syncing weekly_mass_check check: dns_block_rule URIBL_BLOCKED hit, creating/home/jarif/.spamassassin/dnsblock_multi.uribl.com (This means dnsbl blocked you due to too many queries. Set all affected rules score to 0, or use "dns_query_restriction deny multi.uribl.com" to disable

Re: Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-05-02 Thread Jari Fredriksson
I have too had a problem of this in my masscheck box. It is a cloud VM in Google Cloud and they do like to provide a /etc/resolv.conf for their own DNS which has been next to impossible to overcome. I do replace it in the beginning of my masscheck process with my own but to no avail. I now

Re: Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-04-30 Thread Richard Doyle
First result on Google: http://cweiske.de/tagebuch/uribl_blocked.htm Short version: URIBL will block you if you use any of the big DNS providers, such as 8.8.8.8. On 4/30/20 11:59 AM, Tom Williams wrote: > Hi!  I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've > used it on and off

Question about the 'URIBL_BLOCKED' rule

2020-04-30 Thread Tom Williams
Hi!  I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've used it on and off for a number years.  :)   Recently, (within the past 6 months or so) I enabled it for email in a shared web hosting environment (we host with InMotionHosting). Anyway, due to the volume of email traffic the