Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
snip /
In short: More details and evidence, please. :)
guenther
Dear Guenther,
thanks and sorry for the late answer. In the meantime, I trained the
filter with a lot mor ham and spam, and now it works quite well. It
seems so, that I definiteley had
Dear Karsten.
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 21:55 +0100, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
I'm still not happy with my Spamassassin ... it don't recognizes a lot
of Spam mails, even my Thunderbird with default properties recognizes
more than SA.
Every day, I train the Bayes filter
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 12:24 +0100, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 21:55 +0100, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
I'm still not happy with my Spamassassin ... it don't recognizes a lot
of Spam mails, even my Thunderbird with default properties recognizes
Hello,
I'm still not happy with my Spamassassin ... it don't recognizes a lot
of Spam mails, even my Thunderbird with default properties recognizes
more than SA.
Every day, I train the Bayes filter with all the spam which were not
already recognized as spam. My question is now: makes it sense to
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 21:55 +0100, Thomas Zastrow wrote:
I'm still not happy with my Spamassassin ... it don't recognizes a lot
of Spam mails, even my Thunderbird with default properties recognizes
more than SA.
Every day, I train the Bayes filter with all the spam which were not
already
