Re: RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS FP

2023-01-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2023-01-11 22:18: 46.183.103.8 is listed because it's an emitter of spam, it has been PSA: everyone using public mirrors should switch to free DQS current spamassassin rule sets uses multiple check_rbl where most of them should be check_rbl_sub to avoid

Re: RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS FP

2023-01-11 Thread Riccardo Alfieri
46.183.103.8 is listed because it's an emitter of spam, it has been heloing with "host-41.36.37.63.tedata.net" and it is hitting traps. I could tell you exactly what botnet family these type of heloes comes from, but I can't. Believe me, that host is infected. So you have an emitter that is

Re: RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS FP

2023-01-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2023-01-11 18:36: No. it checks if an emission is done by an IP that is listed in SBL, and add 3 points if it is (in our DQS implementation at least). IPs listed in SBL are deemed "bad" by default, so an emission from them, even if it's not direct to mx, is bad

Re: RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS FP

2023-01-11 Thread Riccardo Alfieri
No. it checks if an emission is done by an IP that is listed in SBL, and add 3 points if it is (in our DQS implementation at least). IPs listed in SBL are deemed "bad" by default, so an emission from them, even if it's not direct to mx, is bad enough. If you found an FP I encourage you to

RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS FP

2023-01-11 Thread Benny Pedersen
it should only check received last ip, not deeap all ips :/