Based on how far their mailing lists go back, Razor and DCC have been
around since the 2000/2001 time period, and as far as I can tell were
independent projects.
In fact, they're based on different goals/models, which is why it's
useful to use both of them. Razor is interested in specifically
John Andersen wrote:
Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config.
I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2.
Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what other
tests miss?
DCC and Razor are very similar in approach. DCC has recently lost a lot
of community support due to policy
In my experience (which is not statistically comfirmed), Razor
catches more spam than DCC.
Usually if DCC hits, then Razor will probably also hit. This is not
true the other way around:
if Razor hits, DCC regularly doesn't hit. Giampaolo's comments are
also valid: if they both
hit, you get
Jo Rhett wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config.
I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2.
Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what other
tests miss?
DCC and Razor are very similar in approach. DCC has recently lost a
lot of community
Jeff Moss wrote:
pain in the butt. In particular dealing with its log files. By default
it creates thousands of them a day. There is a way to cut that down to
hundreds a day by editing the configuration file. But you still have
to run a cron job to keep them from eating your hard drive.
I use DCC, Razor and Pyzor. I only installed Pyzor because I thought the
more opinions I get on an email the better. By using all 3 I get more spam
emails rejected than if I just use DCC and Razor. It helps raise the score
of the spam emails.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
This seems to extreme to be true. I think you need to fix your DCC
setup :-)
On 19-okt-2006, at 15:19, Coffey, Neal wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config.
I already do the SURBL tests and Razor2.
Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what
My statistics look like this. This is from one lower volume server and
is only since logs rotated at 4am Sunday morning.
DCC - 38,521 (DCC_CHECK)
Razor - 52,596 (RAZOR2_CHECK)
Pyzor - 11,201 (PYZOR_CHECK)
And for the heck of it:
DIGEST_MULTIPLE 38,562
Bill
Leander Koornneef wrote:
On 19-okt-2006, at 10:15, Jo Rhett wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. I already do the
SURBL tests and Razor2. Will I likely gain any thing via this?
Does DCC catch what other tests miss?
DCC and Razor are very similar
Matt Kettler wrote:
Which policy change is that? And what community has DCC lost support in?
(and then he answers his own question)
that's not exactly recent. (Spring 2005)
Sorry, after doing this for 20 years anything that happened a year ago
is recent. Sorry if that confused you.
I'd
On Thursday 19 October 2006 01:01, Leander Koornneef wrote:
. Giampaolo's comments are
also valid: if they both
hit, you get higher scores, which may just be enough to push a spam
above your required_score.
Ah, well then that's not an issue for me.
If razor-50-100 hits its already spam
11 matches
Mail list logo
