* On 08/11/06 13:57 +, Justin Mason wrote:
| has anyone got a good corpus of mail from this mail tool?
| I hear many anti-image-spam rules have a tendency to FP on its
| output and I'd like to try to avoid this (where possible).
Hmm, I wish I had, but yes, I do agree with the fact that alot
Title: RE: IncrediMail?
has anyone got a good corpus of mail from this mail tool?
I hear many anti-image-spam rules have a tendency to FP on its
output and I'd like to try to avoid this (where possible).
--j.
Yes they do FP. I hate that nasty hunk of bloated junk. I do not have
Justin Mason wrote:
has anyone got a good corpus of mail from this mail tool?
I hear many anti-image-spam rules have a tendency to FP on its
output and I'd like to try to avoid this (where possible).
--j.
It may not matter, but if you provide unlimited free tech support as we
do, Incredimail
Title: RE: IncrediMail?
From: Chris Santerre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006
9:27 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: IncrediMail?
has
anyone got a good corpus of mail from this mail tool?
I hear many
...Incredimail is a drag on your staff. Luckily we now only have a few
users with Incredimail. We had over a thousand, and we had calls
constantly.
Btw, this incredible mailer is also the one which leaves
empty lines (TAB only) in the header when it tries to wrap
a long header field such as
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
Would it be a bad idea to write a rule to give a negative score
when the string, META content=IncrediMail is found in the body?
Probably. That's trivial for spammers to forge on an image spam.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746
Mark Martinec wrote:
...Incredimail is a drag on your staff. Luckily we now only have a few
users with Incredimail. We had over a thousand, and we had calls
constantly.
Btw, this incredible mailer is also the one which leaves
empty lines (TAB only) in the header when it tries to wrap
a long
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, DAve wrote:
Yep, among other things it does. I'm not so certain that I would call SA
hitting an Incredamil message as an FP.
How about calling it a waste of resources? It'd be *much* better to
reject IncrediMail at the MTA level using milter-regex et. al. on the
John D. Hardin writes:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, DAve wrote:
Yep, among other things it does. I'm not so certain that I would call SA
hitting an Incredamil message as an FP.
How about calling it a waste of resources? It'd be *much* better to
reject IncrediMail at the MTA level using
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
John D. Hardin writes:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, DAve wrote:
Yep, among other things it does. I'm not so certain that I would call SA
hitting an Incredamil message as an FP.
How about calling it a waste of resources? It'd be *much* better to
Title: RE: IncrediMail?
-Original Message-
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:05 PM
To: Dylan Bouterse
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: IncrediMail?
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
Would
On Wed, November 8, 2006 18:42, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
Would it be a bad idea to write a rule to give a negative score when the
string, META content=IncrediMail is found in the body?
any negative scores will be abused by spammers :(
PS: disable html in your mua when posting to maillists
--
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
John D. Hardin writes:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, DAve wrote:
Yep, among other things it does. I'm not so certain that I would call SA
hitting an Incredamil message as an FP.
How about calling it a waste of resources? It'd be *much*
On Wed, November 8, 2006 22:53, DAve wrote:
John Hardin KA7OHZ
WB9VTB
how is spam on the radio networking ? :-)
--
This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Wed, November 8, 2006 22:53, DAve wrote:
John Hardin KA7OHZ
WB9VTB
how is spam on the radio networking ? :-)
{Field Day flashbacks}
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic
There is no such thing as a false positive on Incredimail. I am quite
pleased to have it relegated to the spam bucket.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has anyone got a good corpus of mail from this mail tool?
I hear many anti-image-spam rules have a
16 matches
Mail list logo
