Matthias Leisi wrote:
Marc Perkel schrieb:
Has anyone determined if ASN information is useful in determining if
a message is/is not spam?
Unfortunately, it does not seem to be *that* useful:
http://matthias.leisi.net/archives/176-Where-does-your-spam-come-from.html
-- Matthias
Is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Perkel schrieb:
| Unfortunately, it does not seem to be *that* useful:
|
http://matthias.leisi.net/archives/176-Where-does-your-spam-come-from.html
|
| Is there any ASNs that are 100% good for whitelisting?
There may or may not be -- I do
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 3:55 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Is ASN information useful?
Has anyone determined if ASN information is useful in determining if a
message is/is not spam?
Apparently
Marc Perkel schrieb:
Has anyone determined if ASN information is useful in determining if a
message is/is not spam?
Unfortunately, it does not seem to be *that* useful:
http://matthias.leisi.net/archives/176-Where-does-your-spam-come-from.html
-- Matthias
At 15:14 14-07-2008, Matthias Leisi wrote:
Unfortunately, it does not seem to be *that* useful:
I've seen some ASNs sending spam only but I don't use that as a rule
as it will catch some good mail over time. As you mentioned, the
volume also depends on the size of the ASN. BTW, you won't
On Monday 14 July 2008 2:55 pm, Marc Perkel wrote:
Has anyone determined if ASN information is useful in determining if a
message is/is not spam?
Don't know about useful this is, but I can get a report any time of guilty
ASN's from the SpamTools scripts I run. Below is the top 10 spamming ASN's
