Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-10 Thread Matt Kettler
jdow wrote: From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Let's look at their IPs they are hosting their domain from: $ host uhmcargo*MUNGED*.com snip Fascinating - even the whois registration seems to have MPD, er Multiple Personality Disorder. This is what I got in part: ===8--- Registrant:

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-10 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK On a side note, to anyone watching this seemingly incredible long discusion about one FP: This is typically what URIBL member do. We take every FP and delist request seriously. We do deep research on each one. Much deeper then anything you have

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-10 Thread qqqq
RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK|On a side note, to anyone watching this seemingly incredible long discusion about one FP: |This is typically what URIBL member do. We take every FP and delist request seriously. We do deep research on |each one. Much deeper then anything you have seen here

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Randal, Phil
But. There are some spammers who run subscribe to mailing lists. I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example. I call this stuff subscription spam and would block most of it anyway. Cheers, Phil Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
| But. | | There are some spammers who run subscribe to mailing lists. | | I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example. | | I call this stuff subscription spam and would block most of it anyway. | | Cheers, | | Phil Easier said than done when you have a paying

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Jay Lee
wrote: | But. | | There are some spammers who run subscribe to mailing lists. | | I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example. | | I call this stuff subscription spam and would block most of it anyway. | | Cheers, | | Phil Easier said than done when you have a

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK | But. | | There are some spammers who run subscribe to mailing lists. | | I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example. | | I call this stuff subscription spam and would block most of it anyway. | | Cheers

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
| | Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this specific mailing. | | Have you tried lowering the score of the spamassassin rules that are | getting hit? | | Jay I'll look at a couple of the examples and see what else is firing. I may have to tune URI_BLACK down a

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
-Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:44 To: Jay Lee Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK | | Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this specific mailing

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
wrote: | | Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this specific mailing. | | Have you tried lowering the score of the spamassassin rules that are | getting hit? | | Jay I'll look at a couple of the examples and see what else is firing. I may have

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK I've scored GREY at 0.1 as an informational rule. It's S/O is so poor it is more qualified to be a nonspam rule. ( 0.354 in the nightly mass-check Theo posted) Thats actually perfect. Exactly what it was designed to be :) Had it been

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris Santerre wrote: Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this specific mailing. Voluntary Human Shileds. They should find another provider, as the needs of the many outweight the needs of the few. Are you referring to 's customers, or anyone who's using

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris Santerre wrote: Are you referring to 's customers, or anyone who's using URIBL_BLACK? Just his customer. :) I'm not that crazy! Are you sure? :) Oh, wait.. I forgot.. the first rule of the crazy sysadmins club is...

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:32 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK Chris Santerre wrote

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 2:12 PM To: Chris Santerre Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK Chris Santerre wrote

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got captured. The mailing was from Monster.com and the customer is livid :-( X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.1 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist * [URIs:

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK -Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK RE: My only problem

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
-Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:12 To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got captured

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
Chris and Dallas, Thank you for pointing this out. I will convey this back to the customer. - Original Message - From: Dallas L. Engelken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 1:20 PM Subject: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Chris Santerre wrote: -Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread qqqq
: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK | Chris Santerre wrote: | | | -Original Message- | From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM | To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' | Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org | Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:42 To: Dallas L. Engelken; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK Chris and Dallas, Thank you for pointing this out. I will convey this back to the customer. - Original

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
resend again because SA is bouncing them.. -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:51 To: Chris Santerre Cc: ''; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK Chris Santerre wrote

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Michael Monnerie
On Dienstag, 9. Mai 2006 17:37 wrote: Easier said than done when you have a paying customer who wants this specific mailing. He should just filter back those mails from the SPAM folder. You do send all SPAM to him anyway, just marked, don't you? So he has it. mfg zmi -- // Michael

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Dallas L. Engelken wrote: resend again because SA is bouncing them.. -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 14:51 To: Chris Santerre Cc: ''; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
-Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 15:29 To: Dallas L. Engelken Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK Dallas L. Engelken wrote: resend again because SA is bouncing them

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Dallas L. Engelken wrote: http://www.joewein.net/fraud/fraud-job-2006-04.htm i posted that, and reposted it due to list reject, about 30 min ago. did it not come through? It depends upon how you define came through... Posted to the list - [OK] Delivered from list to my server - [OK]

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread List Mail User
... What are your thoughts guys? Lower the score for URI_BLACK and JP? seriously? the domains is 3 days old and is unreachable, and uses outfitter.net NS's which appear to have an identity crisis. April 25th, ns1.outfiter.net 206.173.156.105 ns2.outfiter.net 24.98.13.40 April

RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread Dallas L. Engelken
-Original Message- From: List Mail User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:36 PM To: Dallas L. Engelken; users@spamassassin.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK ... What are your thoughts guys

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread jdow
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: My only problem with URIBL_BLACKHere's one that just got captured. The mailing was from Monster.com and the customer is livid :-( X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message

Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK

2006-05-09 Thread jdow
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris Santerre wrote: -Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 3:12 PM To: Chris Santerre; 'Matt Kettler' Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: My only problem with URIBL_BLACK RE: My only