header __L_MSG_HAS_C_TYPE_M Content-Type =~ /^(message|multipart)/i
rawbody __L_MSG_HAS_BODY /\S/
describe L_MSG_NO_BODY Raw message does not have any body data
meta L_MSG_NO_BODY (!__L_MSG_C_TYPE_M !__L_MSG_BODY)
score L_MSG_NO_BODY 0.1
BTW, I am doing this so that postfix can trap the
On 7/12/2005 8:59 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
Note that in business circles content includes the subject. As far
as I know, rawbody won't see a subject. It is fairly common to send
one line questions in the subject with an empty body, and one line
replies likewise.
I have trained my users
On 7/10/2005 4:41 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 7/10/2005 3:49 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
However, if you want something like this, just off the top of my head:
header __HAS_TOTo =~/\S/
body__HAS_BODY/\S/
metaEMPTY_MSG(!__HAS_TO !__HAS_BODY)
Good idea. rawbody works better
This brings up a question. Why are these sent out? To validate addresses
perhaps?
Virtually all of the ones I see typically also lack either or both of a
subject and a To: address. They very typically have some header information
mangled also.
My belief is that one of the spammer tools (I
On 7/10/2005 3:12 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
Anybody got a rule that will catch messages that don't have a body?
There are things like that around. I have a rather draconian pesonal
rule I use. There is a much milder form in one of the SARE rulesets.
The problem is you can't check just
I guess I should have asked the obvious question:
and if so, could you post it?
Well, I'd hoped that the 'draconian' would detract from that idea. But
since you ask anyway, I went looking. And discovered that I *don't* have a
rule for this anymore! I'm just getting by on the SARE rules
Anybody got a rule that will catch messages that don't have a body?
3.1.0-pre3 has this already...
-
# __MIME_ATTACHMENT defined in 20_html_tests.cf
body __NONEMPTY_BODY/\S/
meta EMPTY_MESSAGE !__MIME_ATTACHMENT !__NONEMPTY_BODY
describe EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears
On 7/10/2005 3:49 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
However, if you want something like this, just off the top of my head:
header __HAS_TOTo =~/\S/
body__HAS_BODY/\S/
metaEMPTY_MSG(!__HAS_TO !__HAS_BODY)
Good idea. rawbody works better but the model is right.
--
Eric A. Hall
Rawbody will miss the subject, so you will need to add a test for that too.
Loren
On 7/10/2005 4:56 PM, Loren Wilton wrote:
Rawbody will miss the subject, so you will need to add a test for that too.
I'm not looking for that
--
Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/
10 matches
Mail list logo
