Re: [SPAM:9.6] Re: [SPAM:9.6] Re: [SPAM:9.6] Off Topic - SPF - What a Disaster

2010-02-24 Thread Christian Brel
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:37:49 +0100 Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote: Christian Brel wrote: Humour me. Does this not mean a need to change the outbound to either a different IP or port? IP yes. I assume your external and internal network are on different IP-ranges. What

Re: [SPAM:9.6] Re: [SPAM:9.6] Re: [SPAM:9.6] Off Topic - SPF - What a Disaster

2010-02-24 Thread Mariusz Kruk
On Wednesday, 24 of February 2010, Christian Brel wrote: No, they submit on 25 using TLS+SASL. Would making the changes to Firewall, MTA, plus potentially thosands of clients be easier than SPF? Would all those angry users screaming because they can't send mail at all be a good thing? I don't

Re: [SPAM:9.6] Re: [SPAM:9.6] Re: [SPAM:9.6] Off Topic - SPF - What a Disaster

2010-02-24 Thread Per Jessen
Christian Brel wrote: On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:37:49 +0100 Per Jessen p...@computer.org wrote: Christian Brel wrote: Humour me. Does this not mean a need to change the outbound to either a different IP or port? IP yes. I assume your external and internal network are on