Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-05-18 Thread fatuglymoomoo
Hi, I am using account level filtering thru CPANEL. Check if you have similar functions at your admin level for your mail server 1) I currently sieve out emails with subject containing words with sexual references 2) and i reject all emails with png image files (body containing: Content-Type:

Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-05-18 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 18 May 2009, fatuglymoomoo wrote: 2) and i reject all emails with png image files (body containing: Content-Type: image/png;) That's a little harsh by itself. conclusion:- i think emails with only a PNG are 99.999% spam We agree, and we've posted some rules that check for that.

Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-05-18 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 17:01 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 18 May 2009, an anonymous Nabble user wrote: 2) and i reject all emails with png image files (body containing: Content-Type: image/png;) That's a little harsh by itself. Agreed, definitely. Makes one wonder if he knows what

Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-05-18 Thread LuKreme
On 18-May-2009, at 18:45, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: Now, what's the proper term for archive in forum context rather than mailing lists...? Lame? :D -- Nothing gold can stay -- Robert Frost Stay gold -- Johnny Cade

Re: Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-05-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, May 1, 2009 19:34, Michelle Konzack wrote: This rule has already collected over 480 MByte... next create clamav sigs :) -- http://localhost/ 100% uptime and 100% mirrored :)

Re: Re: Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-05-02 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2009-05-02 19:41:23, schrieb Benny Pedersen: next create clamav sigs :) Currently I have over 23000 original viriis and the shit coming in are only copies of them... So collecting more viriis is is boring... :-) Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Tamay Dogan

Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-05-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Dave Funk wrote: Bob Proulx wrote: I was about to write the list and ask if there is a rule that could be triggered when a message [contains] only an image part but no text parts. There should already be rules for that exact format. Which rules? I see no rule hits here. I see that I can

Re: Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-05-01 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hi Bob, Am 2009-04-30 21:41:30, schrieb Bob Proulx: I was about to write the list and ask if there is a rule that could be triggered when a message no only an image part but no text parts. I have no idea how to create it but that would be very useful for me and this type of spam. As far as

Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-04-30 Thread Wolfgang Zeikat
Michelle Konzack wrote: Does someone know HOW to reject this crap eectively? SpamAssassin does not reject mail. But with the clamav plugin and the 3rd party clamav signatures from sanesecurity.com, it detects them pretty well here. Hope this helps, wolfgang

Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-04-30 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 1 May 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote: I get since some days over 43 (yes four hundred tirty thausend) PNG spams of arround 14-16 kByte and spamassassin tags them all as ham. Check the list archives for today, there's been some discussion of detecting them via ImageInfo. -- John

Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-04-30 Thread Bob Proulx
Michelle Konzack wrote: I get since some days over 43 (yes four hundred tirty thausend) PNG spams of arround 14-16 kByte and spamassassin tags them all as ham. I have been getting pummeled by the image only spam messages too. Does someone know HOW to reject this crap eectively? I

Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM argh

2009-04-30 Thread Dave Funk
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Bob Proulx wrote: Michelle Konzack wrote: I get since some days over 43 (yes four hundred tirty thausend) PNG spams of arround 14-16 kByte and spamassassin tags them all as ham. I have been getting pummeled by the image only spam messages too. Does someone know