Re: SIG: SpamAssassin Milter Plugin Remote Arbitrary Command Injection Attempt

2010-03-10 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Mar-2010, at 02:45, Brian wrote: On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 02:36 -0700, LuKreme wrote: On 08-Mar-10 23:51, Brian wrote: Yes, but that does not answer my question {and is once more Postfix biased} AFAIK Postfix is totally unable to reject mail at SMTP time that Spamassassin decides IS SPAM

Re: SIG: SpamAssassin Milter Plugin Remote Arbitrary Command Injection Attempt

2010-03-10 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Mar-2010, at 05:51, Brian wrote: On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 13:17 +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Brian brel.astersik100...@copperproductions.co.uk: In the year 2010 it is not unreasonable to expect the MTA that takes responsibility for accepting a message to make reasonable checks about

Re: SIG: SpamAssassin Milter Plugin Remote Arbitrary Command Injection Attempt

2010-03-10 Thread LuKreme
On 9-Mar-2010, at 06:50, Brian wrote: Postfix remains an MTA for the 1990's as it is, but that's just a view. If 9x% of the traffic an MTA gets to see is unwanted SPAM, it's not unreasonable to expect a solid and reliable built in mechanism to reject it. My postfix rejects more than 90% of