On 03/03/2010 21:32, Michael Scheidell wrote:
tracking down some FP's on Sa 3.3.0, they all hit URIBL_DBL.
(every email hits that rule)
# DBL, http://www.spamhaus.org/dbl/ . Note that hits return 127.0.1.x
# A records, so we use a 32-bit mask to match that /24 range.
uridnssub
On 3/3/2010 1:40 PM, Mike Cardwell wrote:
On 03/03/2010 21:32, Michael Scheidell wrote:
tracking down some FP's on Sa 3.3.0, they all hit URIBL_DBL.
(every email hits that rule)
# DBL, http://www.spamhaus.org/dbl/ . Note that hits return 127.0.1.x
# A records, so we use a 32-bit mask to
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Bill Landry wrote:
Yeah. You shouldn't be using it like that on 3.3.0. Go to
http://www.spamhaus.org/dbl and look for SpamAssassin on the FAQ page.
The DBL entries were added via sa-update yesterday, not added manually -
at least for me.
Anytime someone uses a new concept,
On 3/3/10 4:45 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
The DBL entries were added via sa-update yesterday, not added manually -
at least for me.
Bill
seems to be an SA 3.3.1 thing. I'll have to delete it and hope it
doesn't show up tomorrow.
I'll open an SA bug.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone:
On 03/03/2010 21:45, Bill Landry wrote:
tracking down some FP's on Sa 3.3.0, they all hit URIBL_DBL.
(every email hits that rule)
# DBL, http://www.spamhaus.org/dbl/ . Note that hits return 127.0.1.x
# A records, so we use a 32-bit mask to match that /24 range.
uridnssub URIBL_DBL
On 3/3/10 4:52 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
On 3/3/10 4:45 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
I'll open an SA bug.
i am too late SA QA folks already got it:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6363
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
*| *SECNAP Network
(Sorry for the direct reply, Michael. On-list, too.)
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 16:32 -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
tracking down some FP's on Sa 3.3.0, they all hit URIBL_DBL.
(every email hits that rule)
See bug 6363 [1] and bug 6335 [2].
Update has been done, should already be propagating to
