Warren Togami wrote on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:13:10 -0400:
I highly recommend NOT building the RPM package from the spec file contained
within the spamassassin tarball. It has never been tested to work on Fedora
or Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Well, it works perfectly on CentOS, so I assume on
On Mon, March 22, 2010 9:01 am, Bill Landry wrote:
On 3/22/2010 4:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Warren Togami wrote on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:13:10 -0400:
I highly recommend NOT building the RPM package from the spec file
contained
within the spamassassin tarball. It has never been tested to work
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Well, it works perfectly on CentOS, so I assume on RHEL as well. And it
doesn't contain unwanted dependencies (like the one from rpmforge
I'm curious about these unwanted dependencies, since I've never had
trouble with that using the RPMForge package. About the only
Bill Landry wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:01:26 -0700:
I tried it with Fedora 12
I didn't say anything about Fedora.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Mon, March 22, 2010 10:31 am, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Bill Landry wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:01:26 -0700:
I tried it with Fedora 12
I didn't say anything about Fedora.
But Warren certainly did in his original post. And BTW, he didn't say
anything about CentOS is his original post, but that
Kris Deugau wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:25:34 -0400:
I'm curious about these unwanted dependencies, since I've never had
trouble with that using the RPMForge package.
I can't tell you as this was at least one year ago. I would have to change
my priorities settings and then pull down an rpm
Bill Landry wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:37:12 -0700:
But Warren certainly did in his original post.
If you didn't reply to me I would ask you to reply to the message you reply
to instead and don't quote me ;-)
And BTW, he didn't say
anything about CentOS is his original post, but that
