On 1/8/2023 12:36 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 07.01.23 12:03, joe a wrote:
Thanks. I think I actually got unbound working but still was
getting URIBL rejects from spamhaus.
On 1/7/2023 1:25 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
- do you actually use that unbound server? is 127.0.0.1 in
On 1/8/2023 2:08 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On 07.01.23 14:06, joe a wrote:
Pretty sure. Or, I was. Ran various tests with unbound running
and
not running confirmed it was working, at least providing a
response.
Thats pretty simple to check, provided you've got Wireshark installed:
Fire it
> > On 07.01.23 14:06, joe a wrote:
> > > Pretty sure. Or, I was. Ran various tests with unbound running
> > > and
> > > not running confirmed it was working, at least providing a
> > > response.
> >
Thats pretty simple to check, provided you've got Wireshark installed:
Fire it up and tell it
On 1/8/2023 12:36 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 07.01.23 12:03, joe a wrote:
Thanks. I think I actually got unbound working but still was
getting URIBL rejects from spamhaus.
On 1/7/2023 1:25 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
- do you actually use that unbound server? is 127.0.0.1 in
On 07.01.23 12:03, joe a wrote:
Thanks. I think I actually got unbound working but still was
getting URIBL rejects from spamhaus.
On 1/7/2023 1:25 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
- do you actually use that unbound server? is 127.0.0.1 in
/etc/resolv.conf?
On 07.01.23 14:06, joe a wrote:
joe a skrev den 2023-01-07 20:07:
On 1/7/2023 12:16 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2023-01-07 18:03:
That will give me some time to review how to disable specific checks,
such as dnswl.org which caused a score of -5.0 for some obviously
spammy stuff.
please report spam
On 1/7/2023 12:16 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2023-01-07 18:03:
That will give me some time to review how to disable specific checks,
such as dnswl.org which caused a score of -5.0 for some obviously
spammy stuff.
please report spam https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=17
especily
On 1/7/2023 1:25 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 1/7/2023 9:06 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DnsBlocklists
Q: My queries to a DNS-blocklist were blocked. What does this mean?
...
Resolving the block might be as simple as using
On 1/7/2023 9:06 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/DnsBlocklists
Q: My queries to a DNS-blocklist were blocked. What does this mean?
...
Resolving the block might be as simple as using your own
non-forwarding caching nameserver
joe a skrev den 2023-01-07 18:03:
That will give me some time to review how to disable specific checks,
such as dnswl.org which caused a score of -5.0 for some obviously
spammy stuff.
please report spam https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=17
especily for dnswl hi
On 1/7/2023 9:06 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, joe a wrote:
Attempting to utilize the various block lists and find rejection
messages in mail headers "blocked due to usage of an open resolver".
On 06.01.23 09:49, John Hardin wrote:
Are you forwarding your SpamAssassin
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, joe a wrote:
Attempting to utilize the various block lists and find rejection
messages in mail headers "blocked due to usage of an open resolver".
On 06.01.23 09:49, John Hardin wrote:
Are you forwarding your SpamAssassin DNS queries to your ISP or (e.g.)
Google?
Best
On 1/6/2023 12:49 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, joe a wrote:
. ..
I think you're getting distracted by the word "resolve" there... This
sounds like a DNS issue.
Agree it is likely a DNS issue. Apparently one I do not yet grasp.
Is there an online tool to which I can make a
joe a skrev den 2023-01-06 18:35:
On 1/6/2023 12:15 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
My interpretation is thus:
You have a firewall with a public IP and an private IP
You have a box with email behind that firewall.
When it talks to the world, it should do helo that maps back to
your Firewall's
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, joe a wrote:
Attempting to utilize the various block lists and find rejection messages in
mail headers "blocked due to usage of an open resolver".
Are you forwarding your SpamAssassin DNS queries to your ISP or (e.g.)
Google?
Best practice is to set up a local,
On 1/6/2023 12:15 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
My interpretation is thus:
You have a firewall with a public IP and an private IP
You have a box with email behind that firewall.
When it talks to the world, it should do helo that maps back to
your Firewall's public IP not to a private RFC1918
My interpretation is thus:
You have a firewall with a public IP and an private IP
You have a box with email behind that firewall.
When it talks to the world, it should do helo that maps back to
your Firewall's public IP not to a private RFC1918 address.
Regards,KAM
On 1/6/2023 12:00 PM,
Attempting to utilize the various block lists and find rejection
messages in mail headers "blocked due to usage of an open resolver".
One of many things puzzling me at the moment is something found in the
related Wiki that states "A: Third, if your email gateway is behind a
firewall make sure
18 matches
Mail list logo
