On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, David Cary Hart wrote:
If someone can figure out the mechanics, I have a volunteer
(working on her MBA) who is great at crafting policy. I also have
the mirrors and structure. I am willing to add the zone. My first
listing would be Gandi.
I have beta versions of this
-Original Message-
From: Bill Horne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 8:06 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Registrar RBL: nomination and scoring
Homelinux.org is owned by dyndns.org, and the company gives
out domain names like
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 06:26:18PM -0700, jdow wrote:
drily I wonder what the reputation of homelinux.org is these days.
(I just posted a couple rules to the FC mailing list about them.
A spam was relayed through them to the list followed by two shills
who copied the entire message and
From: Bill Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 06:26:18PM -0700, jdow wrote:
drily I wonder what the reputation of homelinux.org is these days.
(I just posted a couple rules to the FC mailing list about them.
A spam was relayed through them to the list followed by two shills
who
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Rob McEwen wrote:
I'm not sure zone transfers will be feasible, since the registrar
determination will be made dynamically.
I think, to prevent processing overloads, you might want to cache
results at least for a period of minutes and not recalculate
results for every
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, August 13, 2006 02:11, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
127.0.0.1 ... 127.0.0.100 perhaps? How would a rule to score points
based on the returned IP look? Can/does SA cache the returned IP and
test it in
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:11:34 -0700 (PDT), John D. Hardin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opined:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
If someone does make a Registrar RBL and a Name Server RBL (both
of which are good ideas), _PLEASE_ do something like this:
a) have two lists for each RBL, one which
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, David Cary Hart wrote:
b) have an RBL which returns different values for different
confidence levels.
127.0.0.1 ... 127.0.0.100 perhaps? How would a rule to score points
based on the returned IP look?
I actually considered doing this. However:
1.
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:26:28 -0700 (PDT), John D. Hardin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] opined:
Registrars' Terms of Service should be publicly available for
review; standards for ToS treatment of spammer behavior should be
fairly easy to develop and apply.
Registrars' responsiveness to complaints
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, David Cary Hart wrote:
I don't disagree with any of this. In fact, this could be a very
powerful economic boycott which is why I thought about it. I am
only pointing our the administrative difficulties.
How would you suggest the query mechanism works? I Most whois
On Aug 13, 2006, at 8:41 AM, John D. Hardin wrote:
There still remains the question about what **exactly** should the
numerator and the denominator be when calculating that percentage?
Any ideas yet?
Not from me.
I don't know either. I base the general idea on the IronPort Sender
Base
From: John D. Hardin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, August 13, 2006 02:11, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
127.0.0.1 ... 127.0.0.100 perhaps? How would a rule to score points
based on the returned IP look? Can/does SA cache
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
I like the idea of an RBL gives ratings instead of binary values.
That's why I thought of it being a confidence percentage instead
of just a yes, we have them listed in the zone. How to build
that confidence rating is another matter entirely.
There's
From: John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 13, 2006, at 8:41 AM, John D. Hardin wrote:
There still remains the question about what **exactly** should the
numerator and the denominator be when calculating that percentage?
Any ideas yet?
Not from me.
I don't know either. I base the
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
If someone does make a Registrar RBL and a Name Server RBL (both
of which are good ideas), _PLEASE_ do something like this:
a) have two lists for each RBL, one which has the above kill the
bystanders point of view, and one which is much more
On Aug 12, 2006, at 5:11 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
b) have an RBL which returns different values for different
confidence levels. Something like a percentage of known spammers
are on that specific provider. So, if a registrar is 60% spammers
and 40% bystanders, it will return 60... and I
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 5:11 PM, John D. Hardin wrote:
b) have an RBL which returns different values for different
confidence levels.
127.0.0.1 ... 127.0.0.100 perhaps? How would a rule to score points
based on the returned IP look? Can/does SA cache
I'm not sure zone transfers will be feasible, since the registrar
determination will be made dynamically.
I think, to prevent processing overloads, you might want to cache results at
least for a period of minutes and not recalculate results for every thing
query. I'm sure this isn't something
On Sun, August 13, 2006 02:11, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, John Rudd wrote:
127.0.0.1 ... 127.0.0.100 perhaps? How would a rule to score points
based on the returned IP look? Can/does SA cache the returned IP and
test it in multiple rules without making multiple DNS queries?
19 matches
Mail list logo
