Rules penalizing The BAT!

2007-12-18 Thread Ken Morley
I'm using Postfix 2.4.6, Amavisd-new 2.5.2, ClamAV 0.91.2 and Mail-SpamAssassin 3.2.3 in a Linux mail filter. As I recall, SA used to have some rules that penalized e-mail originating from mass-emailing applications like The Bat!. I see some of these now slipping through and don't see where

Re: Rules penalizing The BAT!

2007-12-18 Thread Matt Kettler
Ken Morley wrote: I'm using Postfix 2.4.6, Amavisd-new 2.5.2, ClamAV 0.91.2 and Mail-SpamAssassin 3.2.3 in a Linux mail filter. As I recall, SA used to have some rules that penalized e-mail originating from mass-emailing applications like The Bat!. I see some of these now slipping

Re: Rules penalizing The BAT!

2007-12-18 Thread Duane Hill
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:03:05 -0500 Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Bat! isn't a mass-emailing application. And frankly, I'm miffed that iowatelecom.net flat out rejects messages with the X-Mailer set to The Bat! -- _|_ (_| |

Re: Rules penalizing The BAT!

2007-12-18 Thread Duane Hill
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:53:13 -0500 Ken Morley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Postfix 2.4.6, Amavisd-new 2.5.2, ClamAV 0.91.2 and Mail-SpamAssassin 3.2.3 in a Linux mail filter. As I recall, SA used to have some rules that penalized e-mail originating from mass-emailing applications