On 03.08.09 09:43, monolit wrote:
If you are so clever (because I am bad english speaker) you can explain me
this problematics in my mail(po slovensky). Its problem for you? I didnt
enough good materials about this theme in czech language.
Well,
- do not train on fake messages.
- do not modify
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:39:44 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 03.08.09 09:43, monolit wrote:
If you are so clever (because I am bad english speaker) you can explain
me
this problematics in my mail(po slovensky). Its problem for you? I
didnt
enough good materials about
Good morning. The output of sa-learn --dump magic after bayes learning is +1
nspam/nham. I tried the command several. times. I tried write the mail with
Subject: viagra; body: viagra and sent it from my first account to the my
second account(score 0,4). Then I used sa-learn -spam for this mail. I
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 23:50 -0700, monolit wrote:
Good morning. The output of sa-learn --dump magic after bayes learning is +1
nspam/nham. I tried the command several. times. I tried write the mail with
I did not ask for the difference. I asked for the output of the command.
Subject: viagra;
I got you output of the command sa-learn --dump magic. About your end of your
report...it could not be AWL because I have AWL disabled. I had lucky today
... my chief was busy. I will present my solutions tomorrow:)
--
View this message in context:
On 03.08.09 09:20, monolit wrote:
I got you output of the command sa-learn --dump magic. About your end of
your report...it could not be AWL because I have AWL disabled. I had lucky
today ... my chief was busy. I will present my solutions tomorrow:)
Better don't present it until you finally
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:20 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
I got you output of the command sa-learn --dump magic.
No, you did NOT provide the output. But hey, there's no point in
arguing over this or further following up with this thread anyway.
--
char
If you are so clever (because I am bad english speaker) you can explain me
this problematics in my mail(po slovensky). Its problem for you? I didnt
enough good materials about this theme in czech language.
--
View this message in context:
Lieber Karl. I dont know of what command output you need? You said sa-learn
--dump magic. What can I think about your requirement? I am total confusing
from you ...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/SA-learn-%28spamassassin%29-tp24773517p24794182.html
Sent from the
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:43:49 -0700 (PDT), monolit xmull...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you are so clever (because I am bad english speaker) you can explain
me
this problematics in my mail(po slovensky). Its problem for you? I didnt
enough good materials about this theme in czech language.
its hard to
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 09:49 -0700, an annoying Nabble user wrote:
Lieber Karl. I dont know of what command output you need? You said sa-learn
--dump magic. What can I think about your requirement? I am total confusing
from you ...
Karl?
Dear anonymous Nabble user,
what I requested from
I am really sorry I am tired from work. I made mistake with your name. This
task is serious please dont joke (Oh, yeah, you do. We established that
before. After all, this entire thread started as a copy-n-paste from an
Ubuntu forum. ) I established the thread hier and then copy it to the Ubuntu
I read spamassassin docs... I found out the following:
Sa-learn
--spam
Learn the input message(s) as spam. If you have previously learnt any of
the messages as ham, SpamAssassin will forget them first, then re-learn them
as spam. Alternatively, if you have previously learnt them as spam,
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
monolit xmull...@gmail.com wrote:
I changed the value on 1(I use this for testing and my
self-learning its my homework). According to me - spam bayes learning
was activated. When I use sa-learning so bayes learn that the mail is
spam. And bayes learn
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 02:00 +0100, RW wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:42:21 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
when I learn bayes by hand (sa-learn --spam --file mail) that this
mail is spam? I have explicit set in local.cf bayes_min_spam_num 1.
This means that for bayes is sufficient one
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:15:52 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 02:00 +0100, RW wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:42:21 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
It's a counter-measure against bad learning, to force at least
some MINIMAL manual training,
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:31 +0100, RW wrote:
AFAIK it doesn't affect autoleaning at all, bayes_min_spam_num
bayes_min_ham_num control when scoring starts.
Well, it *does* nonetheless. *shrug*
If you read back you'll see that that's consistent with what I wrote and
the opposite of
FROM SA WWW
bayes_min_ham_num (Default: 200)
bayes_min_spam_num (Default: 200)
To be accurate, the Bayes system does not activate until a certain
number of ham (non-spam) and spam have been learned. The default is 200 of
each ham and spam, but you can tune these up or down with these two
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:53:53 -0700 (PDT), monolit xmull...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is strange when I use SA-LEARN so database dont expand the size, but
the time of modification is the same when I sa-learn started.
question is ?
Question is logical. When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
to the database and I think that database have to increase size. If you have
for example *.doc file and you modify it. You add several words - *.doc will
be bigger(increase his size).
--
View this message in context:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:53 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
I have theory ...I know you will think thats bad but I tried explain how I
understand SA documentation. When I set the bayes_min_spam_num 1 so it
means that Bayes learn system will be activate. And now for example: I got
As I
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:20:41 -0700 (PDT), monolit xmull...@gmail.com
wrote:
Question is logical.
so are google :)
When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
to the database and I think that database have to increase size.
no, my bayes db is around 150M, but all my mail is in
To Benny Pedersen: I understand your explanation about increasing of
spamassassin database. Your example with md5 is clearly. Ok thank you very
much!
To by Karsten Bräckelmann-2: I want to apologize for my approach - I use
Ubuntu and other forums because I am hopeless because my homework was
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 14:43 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
To by Karsten Bräckelmann-2: I want to apologize for my approach - I use
Ubuntu and other forums because I am hopeless because my homework was
install configure and run antispam(spamassassin, ClamAV, Clamsmtp,razor,
postfix).
monolit wrote:
Question is logical. When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
to the database and I think that database have to increase size. If you have
for example *.doc file and you modify it. You add several words - *.doc will
be bigger(increase his size).
The database
Hello, I found out the following information:
my SPAMD daemon is running under root. But I have in master.cf(postfix
configuration file) the following lines:
Postfix master process configuration file. For details on the format
# of the file, see the master(5) manual page (command: man 5 master).
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 16:13 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
And the last problem: When I get mail with sign autolearn=ham so I tried
type sa-learn --spam --file mail. When I got the same mail so spamassassin
mark the mail again autolearn=ham. How is it possible when I learn bayes by
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:42:21 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 16:13 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
And the last problem: When I get mail with sign autolearn=ham so I
tried type sa-learn --spam --file mail. When I got the same mail so
28 matches
Mail list logo
