Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Jim Maul
Rick Macdougall wrote: Jim Maul wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, Incorrect, or at least incorrect on the Linux and FBSD servers I maintain. Even running with -u username, spamd will still occasionally write files in /root/.spamassassin unless you specifically specify the path in local.cf. In

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Rick Macdougall
Jim Maul wrote: Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, Incorrect, or at least incorrect on the Linux and FBSD servers I maintain. Even running with -u username, spamd will still occasionally write files in /root/.spamassassin unless you specifically specify the path in local.cf. In my case I run spamd wi

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Jim Maul
Bill Moseley wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:51:54PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote: Probably, but i do not run spamd as root so i dont know for sure. The problem isnt really what user SA is running as, but where it wants to store its files. By default it uses the home directory of the user its runni

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Bill Moseley
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:51:54PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote: > Probably, but i do not run spamd as root so i dont know for sure. The > problem isnt really what user SA is running as, but where it wants to > store its files. By default it uses the home directory of the user its > running as. I'm

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Jim Maul
Bill Moseley wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote: It doesnt normally fill up /root/ unless you are running spamd as root which i would REALLY not do. my .razor/ and .spamassassin/ directories are in /home/spamd/. Actually, i meant spamc, but i believe its the same for

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Bill Moseley
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Jim Maul wrote: > >It doesnt normally fill up /root/ unless you are running spamd as root > >which i would REALLY not do. my .razor/ and .spamassassin/ directories > >are in /home/spamd/. > > Actually, i meant spamc, but i believe its the same for all c

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Jim Maul
Rick Macdougall wrote: Jim Maul wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Upgraded to 3.0.2 a couple of weeks ago, and just noticed that the root FS was nearly full. I had seen this problem in the past with bayes files growing out of control, but have been doing a "sa-learn --force-expire" daily which hel

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Jim Maul
Rick Macdougall wrote: Jim Maul wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Upgraded to 3.0.2 a couple of weeks ago, and just noticed that the root FS was nearly full. I had seen this problem in the past with bayes files growing out of control, but have been doing a "sa-learn --force-expire" daily which hel

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 12:17 PM 1.31.2005 -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote: > > >Jim Maul wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Upgraded to 3.0.2 a couple of weeks ago, and just noticed that the >>> root FS >>> was nearly full. I had seen this problem in the past with bayes files >>> growing out of control, but hav

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Rick Macdougall
Jim Maul wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Upgraded to 3.0.2 a couple of weeks ago, and just noticed that the root FS was nearly full. I had seen this problem in the past with bayes files growing out of control, but have been doing a "sa-learn --force-expire" daily which helps keep that under cont

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Jim Maul
Jim Maul wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Upgraded to 3.0.2 a couple of weeks ago, and just noticed that the root FS was nearly full. I had seen this problem in the past with bayes files growing out of control, but have been doing a "sa-learn --force-expire" daily which helps keep that under contr

Re: SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread Jim Maul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Upgraded to 3.0.2 a couple of weeks ago, and just noticed that the root FS was nearly full. I had seen this problem in the past with bayes files growing out of control, but have been doing a "sa-learn --force-expire" daily which helps keep that under control. However, now

SA 3.x files in root FS

2005-01-31 Thread up
Upgraded to 3.0.2 a couple of weeks ago, and just noticed that the root FS was nearly full. I had seen this problem in the past with bayes files growing out of control, but have been doing a "sa-learn --force-expire" daily which helps keep that under control. However, now I noticed that two othe