Should ALL_TRUSTED be doing this?

2004-11-04 Thread Jason Haar
Hi there I've been getting a fair amount of missed spam with SA-3.01 that looks like it would have been caught if it wasn't for ALL_TRUSTED. e.g. -2.8 ALL_TRUSTEDDid not pass through any untrusted hosts 0.2 RISK_FREE BODY: Risk free. Suuurr 0.8

Re: Should ALL_TRUSTED be doing this?

2004-11-04 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:20 PM 11/4/2004 +1300, Jason Haar wrote: I've been getting a fair amount of missed spam with SA-3.01 that looks like it would have been caught if it wasn't for ALL_TRUSTED. No, it should not. You have one of two problems: 1) SA is confused about trust. This typically happens if your

RE: Should ALL_TRUSTED be doing this?

2004-11-04 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:06 AM 11/4/2004, Mike Carlson wrote: Do you have to add private IP addresses to the trusted_networks list? I only added the public IP Addresses that are set up for our mail server but it does have a private IP and is being NAT'd. SA is going to see the IPs as the machine running SA sees