Quoting martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
also sprach Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.16.1125 +0200]:
The two do very different things. MTA blacklists are direct
rejection of incoming smtp connections by the MTA (in this case
postfix). URIDNSBL is a SpamAssassin check of web sites
Hello All,
I'm using BL in my main.cf config like this:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
.
.
reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
reject_rbl_client safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
.
.
So
also sprach Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.16.1125 +0200]:
The two do very different things. MTA blacklists are direct
rejection of incoming smtp connections by the MTA (in this case
postfix). URIDNSBL is a SpamAssassin check of web sites in
message bodies. Specifically it checks
At 04:08 16-08-2007, martin f krafft wrote:
I disagree. You can disable those RBLs in SA which are already in
use at the postfix perimeter. Postfix will have rejected all
matching mail, so SpamAssassin would never find a match.
Isn't the RBL checks in Postfix done on the IP address of the
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 at 13:08 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
also sprach Jeff Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.08.16.1125 +0200]:
The two do very different things. MTA blacklists are direct
rejection of incoming smtp connections by the MTA (in this case
postfix). URIDNSBL is a
Martin f krafft wrote on Thu, 16 Aug 2007 13:08:35 +0200:
I disagree. You can disable those RBLs in SA which are already in
use at the postfix perimeter. Postfix will have rejected all
matching mail, so SpamAssassin would never find a match.
It will not have rejected them as it doesn't
