On 10 Oct 2014, at 06:49 , RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
It's hard to say, there are advantages and disadvantages either way.
OK, so specific example then.
Small server with a few dozen email users spread over several domains. Almost
Am 12.10.2014 um 18:59 schrieb LuKreme:
On 10 Oct 2014, at 06:49 , RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
It's hard to say, there are advantages and disadvantages either way.
OK, so specific example then.
Small server with a few dozen
On 10/12/2014 9:59 AM, LuKreme wrote:
On 10 Oct 2014, at 06:49 , RWrwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
It's hard to say, there are advantages and disadvantages either
way.
OK, so specific example then.
Small server with a few dozen email
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:26:25 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
Is it possible to have a site-wide bayes AND individual bayes for
some users (or all users)?
Not as things stand. You could use Bayes for one and a separate filter
for the other.
And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
It's hard
On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, RW wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:26:25 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
Is it possible to have a site-wide bayes AND individual bayes for
some users (or all users)?
Not as things stand.
Not as things stand, possibly absent a hack like: any user who wants to
use the site-wide
Is it possible to have a site-wide bayes AND individual bayes for some users
(or all users)?
And, if not, is it generally better to do sitewide?
And, is it possible to take all the individual bayes and combine them into a
stitewide db?
--
You've got to dance like nobody's watching. - Kathy
