Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-28 Thread Benny Pedersen
On ons 27 okt 2010 10:22:16 CEST, Nigel Frankcom wrote Apologies if this is teaching you to suck eggs: In CPAN type: install Digest::SHA dont do this on centos ! make a rpm from cpan is fine, but dont install direct from cpan if its missing point this out on centos repo to have one of the ma

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-28 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 08:12 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > > RH has provided /etc/init.d as a symlink to /etc/rc.d/init.d for quite > > some time now - possibly from the start of the Fedora distributions. I > > don't know why since it saves so little ty

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-28 Thread Jari Fredriksson
On 28.10.2010 18:12, John Hardin wrote: >> >> RH has provided /etc/init.d as a symlink to /etc/rc.d/init.d for quite >> some time now - possibly from the start of the Fedora distributions. I >> don't know why since it saves so little typing. > > More likely to reduce cognitive distruption for thos

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-28 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 06:06 -0700, John Hardin wrote: On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gnanam wrote: So, to have SpamAssassin as part of my system service, can I copy it to /etc/init.d/ ... ./. Caveat: I've been away from RH for a while - have they

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-28 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 06:06 -0700, John Hardin wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gnanam wrote: > > > So, to have SpamAssassin as part of my system service, can I copy it to > > /etc/init.d/ ... > ./. > Caveat: I've been away from RH for a while - have they moved from > /etc/rc.d/init.d to /

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-28 Thread Gnanam
om /etc directory shown below: lrwxrwxrwx 1 rootroot 11 Jul 5 2007 init.d -> rc.d/init.d -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-service-file-missing-after-installation-tp30064897p30076478.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-28 Thread John Hardin
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010, Gnanam wrote: So, to have SpamAssassin as part of my system service, can I copy it to /etc/init.d/ ... Please verify that directory. RedHat and RedHat-derived distributions have historically used /etc/rc.d/init.d to store init scripts and use chkconfig to manage the syml

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-28 Thread Gnanam
.1/spamd/redhat-rc-script.sh /etc/init.d/spamassassin' ? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-service-file-missing-after-installation-tp30064897p30075940.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Ned Slider
On 28/10/10 06:11, Gnanam wrote: Ned Slider wrote: Why the source install? RPMforge has packages for the latest SpamAssassin plus all the required dependencies. Can you give me download link location for the same? See here: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForg

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Gnanam
Ned Slider wrote: > > Why the source install? RPMforge has packages for the latest > SpamAssassin plus all the required dependencies. > Can you give me download link location for the same? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-service-file-m

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Ned Slider
On 27/10/10 14:13, Gnanam wrote: I don't understand your point here. By the way, SpamAssassin is installed from source (Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz) and only dependencies are in RPM. Why the source install? RPMforge has packages for the latest SpamAssassin plus all the required dependenci

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 06:13 -0700, Gnanam wrote: > But, this time, I'm trying to install in CentOS and after installation, if I > say 'service spamassassin start', this is not starting and gives > "spamassassin: unrecognized service", which means service file is not > located in /etc/init.d. So, h

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 06:13:03AM -0700, Gnanam wrote: > > I don't understand your point here. By the way, SpamAssassin is installed > from source (Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz) and only dependencies are in > RPM. I don't think there is any source installation in the world that installs init

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Gnanam
t is included. > I don't understand your point here. By the way, SpamAssassin is installed from source (Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.1.tar.gz) and only dependencies are in RPM. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-service-file-missing-after-installation-tp3006489

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Randy Ramsdell
Gnanam wrote: Hi, My question is, after installation, spamassassin service file is not available in the location /etc/init.d/spamassassin. Because of this 'service spamassassin start' says "spamassassin: unrecognized service". What could be the reason for spama

Re: SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Nigel Frankcom
>I've not installed the optional modules. > >My question is, after installation, spamassassin service file is not >available in the location /etc/init.d/spamassassin. Because of this >'service spamassassin start' says "spamassassin: unrecognized service". >

SpamAssassin service file missing after installation

2010-10-27 Thread Gnanam
ce". What could be the reason for spamassassin service file missing after installation? Because this service file is not automatically installed as part of installation, I've little doubt/fear/confusion whether it would create any other implications during course of usage. NOTE: 1. I'