Hi this mail ius just to say thanks all the people kindly sent me a
mail trying to figure out the low performance in my server.
Right now the server is working well and filtering like I wish. The
changes I did were decrease the number of amavisd processes to 5,
turned off DCC, the
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Luis Croker wrote:
turned off DCC, the network tests and install the DNS service
locallly.
Turning off the network tests will obscure any benefit from installing a
local caching DNS server. Try turning the network tests on for a while and
see whether your performance
Hi all...
I was doing some tests with all the recommendations you sent me...
and I can make to work the server correctly... I was filtering spam with
no problems and my performances troubles dissapeard...
I just configured 5 procs for amavis and postfix content filter and
I
Luis,
I was doing some tests with all the recommendations you sent me...
and I can make to work the server correctly... I was filtering spam with
no problems and my performances troubles dissapeard...
I just configured 5 procs for amavis and postfix content filter and
I turn off
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Mark Martinec wrote:
Luis,
I was doing some tests with all the recommendations you sent me...
and I can make to work the server correctly... I was filtering spam with
no problems and my performances troubles dissapeard...
I just configured 5 procs for amavis and
At 05:51 30-10-2008, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Just to check, you know you should run a RBL check in Postfix BEFORE
it accepts te message, do you? This reduces dramatically the number of
messages your server has to scan. And improves the performance a lot.
You should not run RBL checks on
How can I tunr off the Network tests (RBLs) ??? Just to probe if it
can make the delivery faster.
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 04:05 +, Ned Slider wrote:
Gary V wrote:
6 seconds seems somewhat typical. Mostly due to network tests. Some
RBLs are no longer and you could turn the non
Luis Croker wrote:
How can I tunr off the Network tests (RBLs) ??? Just to probe if it
can make the delivery faster.
In /etc/amavisd.conf, find the following line:
$sa_local_tests_only = 0;# only tests which do not require internet
access?
and change the setting to = 1
then
Hi all...
I continue with slow delivery in my mail server. Like I told you,
the filters are working well, but the mail queue some times is big and
slow.
I have read http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FasterPerformance
and I did some chages to try to get performance. This changes
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Luis Croker wrote:
I continue with slow delivery in my mail server. Like I told you, the
filters are working well, but the mail queue some times is big and slow.
I have read http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FasterPerformance
Have you checked to see whether your
I have 4 CPUS and 4 Gigs of RAM. The server have just the mail
applications and is doing nothing else the CPUs are 100%
available.
About the spamd childs... The amavis-new calls the utilities of
spamassassin but i think it doesnt need the spamd deamon running...
just use it to get
Luis Croker wrote:
Hi all...
I continue with slow delivery in my mail server. Like I told you,
the filters are working well, but the mail queue some times is big
and slow.
I have read http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FasterPerformance
and I did some chages to try to get
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 09:34 -0600, Luis Croker wrote:
Hi all...
.
smtp-amavis unix - - n - 100 smtp
-o smtp_data_done_timeout=1200
-o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes
-o disable_dns_lookups=yes
and I have the same number of procs for amavisd:
$max_servers
Hi... I have done tests with 10 processes, 30, 50, 100 and the
results are the same... I have 4 Gb RAM and spamd is not running...
Regards.
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:01 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Luis Croker wrote:
Hi all...
I continue with slow delivery in my mail
Luis Croker wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:01 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Luis Croker wrote:
Hi all...
I continue with slow delivery in my mail server. Like I told
you, the filters are working well, but the mail queue some times is
big and slow.
I have
On 28.10.08 10:04, Luis Croker wrote:
Hi... I have done tests with 10 processes, 30, 50, 100 and the
results are the same... I have 4 Gb RAM and spamd is not running...
lower it back to 10 or so, unless you receive that much of mail.
Luis Croker wrote:
Hi all...
I
Hi guys..
I have read all your mails and I have decreased the number of procs to
10. the performance is better but continues slow.
The server is not using swap and I have no spamd running, this is
called from amavisd.
How many procs is the recommended for this server with 4 Gb
I have put the log level to 4 in amavisd.conf and this is one
operation... Everything is Ok in times... until SA is called and the
delay goes to 6 seconds... actually at the end of the log amavisd
displays a timing statistics and SA check spent 97% of the time...
Regards.
Oct 28
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Aren't you using redhat? There was some bugreprt about perl in redhat
causing slow processing..
I believe that issue was fixed with the update of perl last month.
Luis Croker wrote:
Hi... I have done tests with 10 processes, 30, 50, 100 and the
results are the same... I have 4 Gb RAM and spamd is not running...
Regards.
You also need to make sure the maxproc column of the feed to amavisd in
/etc/postfix/master.cf matches whatever you've
On 10/28/08, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luis Croker wrote:
Hi... I have done tests with 10 processes, 30, 50, 100 and the
results are the same... I have 4 Gb RAM and spamd is not running...
Regards.
You also need to make sure the maxproc column of the feed to amavisd in
Gary V wrote:
6 seconds seems somewhat typical. Mostly due to network tests. Some
RBLs are no longer and you could turn the non functional RBL rules off
by setting to 0. I'm not sure which ones though. Maybe someone else
knows.
From my own stats of hits against DNSBLs and URIBLs for the last
At 16:56 23-10-2008, Luis Croker wrote:
I have a mail server with FreeBSD 7.0,
postfix+amavis-new+spamassassin. We are an ISP and I need to
filter the spam that our susbribers are sending to internet, the
PCs have some malware or are botnets. These PCs generates a lot of
spam each day.
Luis Croker a écrit :
Hi...
I have a mail server with FreeBSD 7.0,
postfix+amavis-new+spamassassin. We are an ISP and I need to filter the
spam that our susbribers are sending to internet, the PCs have some
malware or are botnets. These PCs generates a lot of spam each day.
The
I have updated the SARE rules... how often should I update them ?
Daily ?
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 23:19 -0700, SM wrote:
At 16:56 23-10-2008, Luis Croker wrote:
I have a mail server with FreeBSD 7.0,
postfix+amavis-new+spamassassin. We are an ISP and I need to
filter the spam that
Luis Croker a écrit :
I have updated the SARE rules... how often should I update them ? Daily ?
no. they don't change often. (I don't update them anymore, so I don't
know when they were last updated...).
JM_SOUGHT rules get updated often.
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Luis Croker wrote:
I have updated the SARE rules... how often should I update them ?
Daily ?
SARE development has frozen while Real Life intrudes. The ninjas have said
they will announce any updates on the list, when and if they occur, and
will announce if regular
At 10:12 24-10-2008, Luis Croker wrote:
I have updated the SARE rules... how often should I update them ? Daily ?
It's been a while since the SARE rules have been updated. Checking
for updates daily would only generate useless traffic. It's better
to get the updates provided by the
Hi.. thanks all for the answers.. I have enabled the most high debug
level and I have figured out some rules that I modified and put the scro
directly in local.cf and now Im filtering very well the mails...
So, now I have another issue... My performance is not good. Some
times I have
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Luis Croker wrote:
So, now I have another issue... My performance is not good. Some
times I have a lot of petitions and the mails goes to the mail queue and
the delivery rate is slow...
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FasterPerformance
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
Hi...
I have a mail server with FreeBSD 7.0, postfix+amavis-new
+spamassassin. We are an ISP and I need to filter the spam that our
susbribers are sending to internet, the PCs have some malware or are
botnets. These PCs generates a lot of spam each day.
The server filters a los of
maybe if you block messages with no rdns record? if its from infected pc's
there shouldnt be a record?
From: Luis Croker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/23/2008 19:56
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Spamassassin+amavis
Hi
On Fri, October 24, 2008 01:56, Luis Croker wrote:
How can I catch more spam than the seerver is filtering ? The server
blocks many messages but another spam messages goes to internet cause
the score does not reach the parameters to be blocked.
go the smtp auth route, when spam comes in
@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 8:05:45 AM
Subject: RE: Spamassassin+amavis
maybe if you block messages with no rdns record? if its from infected pc's
there shouldnt be a record?
From: Luis Croker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/23/2008 19:56
Hi
I am running a linux based virus/spam filtering server which uses
spamassassin - amavis-new - postfix (and clamd).
- After filtering/tagging for virus and spam, the server then forwards mails
to a microsoft exhange system.
- There are no local delivery on the filtering computer, it simply
znapper wrote:
Big question is, how do I do this? The server is set up to relay all mail
adressed to exhange-configured-domain.com and discard anything else.
I've tried to add the spamtrap user and tried to send mail to this user,
using the regular [EMAIL PROTECTED], only resulting
in a error
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 14:07 +0200, Micke Andersson wrote:
znapper wrote:
Big question is, how do I do this? The server is set up to relay all mail
adressed to exhange-configured-domain.com and discard anything else.
I've tried to add the spamtrap user and tried to send mail to this user,
Bill Randle wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 14:07 +0200, Micke Andersson wrote:
znapper wrote:
Big question is, how do I do this?
[cut]
You should NOT forward any mail from Exchange to some other recipient,
since Exchange and Outlook will destroy a lot of the header information,
I will look into it asap, the scripts will come in handy as our filter
needs
it desperately.
Kind regards
Ole-H
If you are only catching 10% of spam, fixing Bayes will help, but it is also
very important to find out what else is wrong. Your Bayes may have become
polluted with low scoring
39 matches
Mail list logo
