Martin Gregorie skrev den 2013-06-07 18:57:
Adding gbresponder.com to your local DNSBL seems quite reasonable to
me.
body FORCE_HTML_READERS_ON /To view the message, please use an HTML
compatible email viewer/i
it works
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Martin Gregorie skrev den 2013-06-07 18:57:
Adding gbresponder.com to your local DNSBL seems quite reasonable to me.
body FORCE_HTML_READERS_ON /To view the message, please use an HTML
compatible email viewer/i
it works
That (and similar
John Hardin skrev den 2013-06-09 05:00:
That (and similar rules) will probably generate a lot of FPs on ham
that does not include a plain-text body part. That is thoughtless,
granted, but hardly a reliable spam sign.
this was just what text readers see, so if this is not spam, what is so
?
Hi,
I'm receiving what I think is spam but looks like it's from a
subscription-based list, yet the domain isn't blacklisted even after
receiving messages similar to these for at least a week:
http://pastebin.com/N7Dw03sG
The domain is gbresponder.com. The LOCAL_SURBL is a local DNSBL I've
On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 12:04 -0400, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm receiving what I think is spam but looks like it's from a
subscription-based list, yet the domain isn't blacklisted even after
receiving messages similar to these for at least a week:
http://pastebin.com/N7Dw03sG
The domain is
On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?
On 12.05.08 23:07, Benny Pedersen wrote:
he, i have +all and forward nothing :)
it's not about what do you forward, it's about others forwarding your
e-mail (without rewriting mail from: which
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?
On 12.05.08 23:07, Benny Pedersen wrote:
he, i have +all and forward nothing :)
it's not about what do you forward, it's about others
On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr +all
in SPF
yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ?
come on, srs and +all it imho the same seen to the recipient
diff is that i dont use srs installed
On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr +all
in SPF
On 13.05.08 21:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ?
no, forwarders need to.
come on, srs and +all it imho the
On Tue, May 13, 2008 23:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
spammers will use whatever they'll see people don't catch.
you just told all spammers to use mx +all in SPF records for their domains
to be able to use them for world-wide spamming
basic score in spf is olso very low pr default, one
On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?
he, i have +all and forward nothing :)
stop annoying me that spf cant be used
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
On Sun, May 11, 2008 03:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I know is that I don't use SPF anymore for my domain as there are
just too many problems... e.g., forwarded messages.
and you usely dont know where you forwards going from, :/(
come on, please :-)
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ?
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 03:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I know is that I don't use SPF anymore for my domain as there are
just too many problems... e.g., forwarded messages.
and you usely dont know where you forwards going from, :/(
unless you receive spam
All a spam program would have to do is say [EMAIL PROTECTED] posts lots
to that list. His address must be a trusted subscriber. Well, here's
one more post from him, muhahaha.
SB If Bob posts a lot to a list(s) and is respected within said
SB list(s), then the other subs of that list will
All a spam program would have to do is say [EMAIL PROTECTED] posts lots
to that list. His address must be a trusted subscriber. Well, here's
one more post from him, muhahaha.
If Bob posts a lot to a list(s) and is respected within said list(s),
then the other subs of that list will immediately
Odd how mailing lists that don't obfuscate addresses don't see more
trusted mailing list subscriber spam.
All a spam program would have to do is say [EMAIL PROTECTED] posts lots
to that list. His address must be a trusted subscriber. Well, here's
one more post from him, muhahaha.
OK, I suppose
On Thu, May 8, 2008 19:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I suppose that would be caught by SPF rules etc., if bob likes SPF.
what are you talking about ?, to score email addresses found on maillist a bit
negative since it looks like none spammy human ?
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ?
17 matches
Mail list logo
