On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, John D. Hardin wrote:
m,https?://(?:[^\./]+\.)*goo+gle(?:pages)?\.(?:[a-z][a-z][a-z]?(?:\.[a-z][a-z])?)/+.*[?](?:btni|adurl),i
If I understand that pattern, both the '*' are 'unbounded'???
This might 'break' your spamfilter, if spamassassin gobbles
up all memory during
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 13:01 +0100, Chr. v. Stuckrad wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, John D. Hardin wrote:
m,https?://(?:[^\./]+\.)*goo+gle(?:pages)?\.(?:[a-z][a-z][a-z]?(?:\.[a-z][a-z])?)/+.*[?](?:btni|adurl),i
If I understand that pattern, both the '*' are 'unbounded'???
This might
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Chr. v. Stuckrad wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, John D. Hardin wrote:
m,https?://(?:[^\./]+\.)*goo+gle(?:pages)?\.(?:[a-z][a-z][a-z]?(?:\.[a-z][a-z])?)/+.*[?](?:btni|adurl),i
If I understand that pattern, both the '*' are 'unbounded'???
This might 'break' your
Whoops! Just noticed I didn't send this to the list after all...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Loren Wilton wrote:
I guess btnl is no longer working. Now they are doing a redirect:
I guess btnl is no longer working. Now they are doing a redirect:
http://google.co.uk///pagead/iclk?sa=lai=livermorenum=970adurl=http://christmas-low-rate.tw?beast
Loren
Quoting Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
the redirect detection should have no problem finding that...
And the redirected-to domain is on two SURBL blacklists, so it should
be hitting.
Jeff C.
Loren Wilton writes:
I guess btnl is no longer working. Now they are doing a redirect:
the redirect detection should have no problem finding that...
Loren Wilton writes:
I guess btnl is no longer working. Now they are doing a redirect:
http://google.co.uk///pagead/iclk?sa=lai=livermorenum=970adurl=http://-low-rate.tw?beast
Loren
