Jo Rhett wrote:
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been down
for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case someone is
dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
This has been answered, but, if
On Jun 30, 2007, at 6:23 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:07:04PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
When in doubt, run through spamassassin -D:
[9710] dbg: uridnsbl: domains to query: sync.pl svcolo.com
Thanks for
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SA doesn't just look for full URLs, it looks for things that could
be
hostnames ala copy www.example.com into your browser.
This is fairly nonfunctional. I've been chasing around all sorts of
FPs that seem to hit pretty much every message that
From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I need to completely disable this over-opportunistic behavior. 90%
of my e-mails have either system output, or are concerning code
segments or router interfaces, etc, etc. I need these mails to get
through.
At the very least, common collisions like
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:05:17PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
I need to completely disable this over-opportunistic behavior. 90%
of my e-mails have either system output, or are concerning code
segments or router interfaces, etc, etc. I need these mails to get
through.
At the very least,
On Jul 2, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
If these are from known good sources, just whitelist them (or skip SA
altogether). Otherwise, if the names are specific, you could always
use uridnsbl_skip_domain to bypass URIDNSBL checks on the parsed
domains.
Both of these assume I know
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:28:27PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Both of these assume I know every person who needs to e-mail me, and
everything they will send me. Theo, you're active in enough open
source projects to know better.
Well, you just said you were receiving a large amount of system
Quoting SM [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 12:07 30-06-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 at 05:58 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Quoting SM [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 12:07 30-06-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed
Hi Jeff,
At 03:58 01-07-2007, Jeff Chan wrote:
http://lookup.uribl.com/?domain=sync.pl
I missed that one. :-) It's not listed though.
Regards,
-sm
Quoting SM [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Jeff,
At 03:58 01-07-2007, Jeff Chan wrote:
http://lookup.uribl.com/?domain=sync.pl
I missed that one. :-) It's not listed though.
It was listed when I wrote.
Jeff C.
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
Begin forwarded message:
From: *snip*
Date: June 29,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:07:04PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
When in doubt, run through spamassassin -D:
[9710] dbg: uridnsbl: domains to query: sync.pl svcolo.com
SA doesn't just look for full URLs, it looks for things that could
At 12:07 30-06-2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Note: yes, uribl has their own mailing list. That server has been
down for quite some time, so I gave up and posted it here in case
someone is dual listed and can fix it.
There's no URL in this message. What is it mis-matching against?
There was a URL in
14 matches
Mail list logo
