Benny Pedersen a écrit :
On Fri, January 9, 2009 22:44, mouss wrote:
# spf/dkim/dk
whitelist_from_auth payme...@paypal.com
this one does not exists
whitelist_auth
def_whitelist_auth
unwhitelist_auth
does
thanks for the correction. next time, I'll cut-n-paste instead of
On Sat, January 10, 2009 09:15, mouss wrote:
Not necessarily. you can extend trust if this brings you more
benefits than problems.
msa_networks depends on trusted_networks, does it make sense ?
maybe, maybe not but i keep my trusted at very few, olso so dns
whitelist will be quered to give
Evan Platt wrote on Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:01:50 -0800:
If there's a few pages of quoted text, it shows ...snip and for
some reason, removes odd things, like in this case, the Nabble tag. Any ideas?
It's a signature. I have configured my reader to grey them out, so they don't
distract, but
Please do not top-post.
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 17:48 -0800, fbpc wrote:
Look, I'm not sending spam, I'm sending REPLY coupons to customers. If you
don't believe me, go to my website www.fbpc.com. I believe the PORN is
triggered because the full name of the bar is the Fat Black Pussycat, which
At 22:01 08-01-2009, Evan Platt wrote:
Ok, unless someone here knows, I'll ask in an Eudora group... I
turned Header mode to Terse. Only shows the From, To, and subject
headers. But also trims the heck out of the message.
If there's a few pages of quoted text, it shows ...snip and for
notice
Please use a mailer that obeys the Reply-To: header. mo...@ml.* is
reserved for mailing list mail (i.e. mail coming from list servers).
/notice
ndwor...@ix.netcom.com a écrit :
It's not spam, it's a reply to a mailing list sign up form. The
customer signs up and then receives a free
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, mouss wrote:
Anyway, I just tried (with a tagged address) and my SA didn't say
anything about the message. so what's the problem?
The problem is not in SA. Apparently he's using a defunct DNSBL that's
overriding the SA score. SA scored the message negative 40-mumble,
On Fri, January 9, 2009 22:44, mouss wrote:
# spf/dkim/dk
whitelist_from_auth payme...@paypal.com
this one does not exists
whitelist_auth
def_whitelist_auth
unwhitelist_auth
does
see perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf and corsponding plugin docs
you should also make sure your
:
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Whitelist-not-working---Ugh-please-help-tp21360757p21360757.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
fbpc a écrit :
I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
*...@fbpc.com
don't do that. now spammers know how to evade your filters.
use reject_from_rcvd or reject_from_auth instead.
but wait. this looks like spam to me. if it is, why are you sending it?
But
-100.00)
X-MailScanner-From: apa...@fbpc.fbpc.com
Status:
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Whitelist-not-working---Ugh-please-help-tp21360757p21360757.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, fbpc wrote:
...
X-FBPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached,
...
In light of all the other comments already given, I couldn't help to
notice the 'ORDB-RBL' in the MailScanner header. I'm assuming that is the
ordb.org RBL that's been dead for
fbpc wrote:
I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
*...@fbpc.com
The above file is a MailScanner config file not a SpamAssassin config
file, it should NOT contain statements of that format. MailScanner's
whitelisting options are formatted differently (I don't
On Thu, January 8, 2009 21:54, fbpc wrote:
I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
*...@fbpc.com
newer use that whitelist_from anywhere !
even mailscanner can be fooled
X-FBPC-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not
cached,
score=-47.589,
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 21:59 +0100, mouss wrote:
fbpc a écrit :
I have whitelisted in my spam.whitelist.rules file: whitelist_from
*...@fbpc.com
don't do that. now spammers know how to evade your filters.
use reject_from_rcvd or reject_from_auth instead.
but wait. this looks like spam
On Thu, January 8, 2009 21:59, Evan Platt wrote:
1. Why are you checking outgoing mail?
if he did not, maybe the sender ip will be blacklisted, much better
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
}}}
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Whitelist-not-working---Ugh-please-help-tp21360757p21364826.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
At 05:48 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
Look, I'm not sending spam, I'm sending REPLY coupons to customers. If you
don't believe me, go to my website www.fbpc.com. I believe the PORN is
triggered because the full name of the bar is the Fat Black Pussycat, which
is a neighborhood bar/nightclub in
On Fri, January 9, 2009 02:48, fbpc wrote:
I came to this forum just to get some help: how do I whitelist
myself effectively.
i can olso ask why whitelist at all is needed ?
but here:
http://old.openspf.org/wizard.html?mydomain=fbpc.comsubmit=Go!
v=spf1 a mx ip4:64.202.0.1/16
://www.nabble.com/Whitelist-not-working---Ugh-please-help-tp21360757p21365041.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, January 9, 2009 03:15, fbpc wrote:
Yes it is my server. My SPF and I have Domain Keys as well. Not
sure why that's relevant.
if you dont know that then remove them
I have followed the instructions on the SpamAssasin website, but
although the headers show that the whitelist is
For the THIRD time, SpamAssassin is not marking the mail as Spam.
Mailscanner is. You need to ask on a mailscanner list.
At 06:15 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
Yes it is my server. My SPF and I have Domain Keys as well. Not sure why
that's relevant.
I have followed the instructions on the
At 18:40 08-01-2009, Evan Platt wrote:
For the THIRD time, SpamAssassin is not marking the mail as Spam.
Mailscanner is. You need to ask on a mailscanner list.
The footer at the bottom of the original message is a hint as to why
your advice won't be understood. :-)
Regards,
-sm
At 09:48 PM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
The footer at the bottom of the original message is a hint as to why
your advice won't be understood. :-)
Regards,
-sm
AARGH!
Ok, unless someone here knows, I'll ask in an Eudora group... I
turned Header mode to Terse. Only shows the From, To, and subject
24 matches
Mail list logo
