Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
http://puffin.net\software\spam\samples\0005_body.txt
Address Not Found
puffin.net\software\spam\samples\0005_body.txt could not be found.
Please check the name and try again.
Did nobody ever told you that URL directories are separated by
slashes, not
John Hardin wrote:
Does this catch it?
mimeheader __UNSPEC_BINARY_ATTACH Content-Type =~
/application\/octet-stream/i
meta MIME_BINARY_ONLY (__CTYPE_MULTIPART_MXD __UNSPEC_BINARY_ATTACH
!__ANY_TEXT_ATTACH)
scoreMIME_BINARY_ONLY 2.00
describe MIME_BINARY_ONLY Unspecified
On 31.05.09 21:25, Chip M. wrote:
Mildly redacted sample posted here:
http://puffin.net\software\spam\samples\0005_rtf.txt
and the plain body, after decoding to plain text (purely for
convenience):
http://puffin.net\software\spam\samples\0005_body.txt
Address Not Found
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, Bob Proulx wrote:
However playing wack-a-mole with each new type isn't productive. Perhaps
this following, completely untested, would be the better way to go.
Just look for any multipart message that doesn't have any text parts.
That actually sounds best to me.
--
John
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Chip M. wrote:
All had a main header Content-Type of multipart/mixed with
exactly one actual Part with a Content-Type of
application/octet-stream containing a name with the file
extension .rtf.
Does this catch it?
mimeheader __UNSPEC_BINARY_ATTACH Content-Type =~
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:55 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Chip M. wrote:
All had a main header Content-Type of multipart/mixed with
exactly one actual Part with a Content-Type of
application/octet-stream containing a name with the file
extension .rtf.
Does this catch
