On 4/21/2015 11:48 PM, David B Funk wrote:
I've got some home-grown rules that I trust to which have added
tflags autolearn_force
Recently I've seen some spam that hit those rules and racked up enough
points that they should have auto-learned. But the scoring analysis
explicitly says autolearn
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 22:48:46 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk wrote:
is the autolearn_force being ignored because of the initial BAYES_00
score?
Yes, a Bayes point in the opposite direction prevents auto-training.
All the force flag does is override the 3+3 rule
I've got some home-grown rules that I trust to which have added
tflags autolearn_force
Recently I've seen some spam that hit those rules and racked up enough
points that they should have auto-learned. But the scoring analysis
explicitly says autolearn=no autolearn_force=no.
What's going on here
in
user_prefs:
tflags INVALID_DATE autolearn_force
tflags are part of the Privileged Settings (see section in M::SA::Conf
docs). For security and efficiency reasons, these are not allowed in
user_prefs, unless allow_user_rules is enabled.
(Just for completeness, dunno if you enabled it.)
Nonetheless
=0.723,RDNS_NONE=0.793,SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,URIBL_BLACK=1.7 X-Spam-Autolearn: no
autolearn_force=no
And here's a case where it doesn't autolearn ham (same user_prefs as
above):
...
The documentation certainly doesn't say anything like the 3/3 and
force mechanism is in place
autolearn_force
tflags URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn_force
tflags URIBL_BLACK autolearn_force
tflags INVALID_DATE autolearn_force
Nonetheless:
X-Spam-Score: 6.9
X-Spam-Tests: BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723,RDNS_NONE=0.793,SPF_PASS=-0.001
On 05/25/2014 07:12 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force
tflags URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn_force
tflags URIBL_BLACK autolearn_force
tflags INVALID_DATE autolearn_force
URIBL rules are not set to use 'userconf' (user configuration)
so entries in user_prefs shouldn't
URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force
Axb should probably read:
Axb tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM net domains_only autolearn_force
Axb etc, etc - and not in user_
Axb iirc, this will also influence Bayes's scoring/learning behaviour.
Axb modifying rules' tflags should be done with care
But it does autolearn
: local.cf) (not
Axb user_prefs)
Axb your: tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force
Axb should probably read:
Axb tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM net domains_only autolearn_force
Axb etc, etc - and not in user_
Axb iirc, this will also influence Bayes's scoring/learning behaviour.
Axb modifying rules' tflags
On Sun, 25 May 2014 20:06:22 +0200
Axb axb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Axb Yes, when it reached certain conditions and a score above 15.0
Axb you can tune that score via local.cf entries:
Axb bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam
Please see the prefs in my post upthread
wide rule (ie: local.cf)
Axb (not user_prefs)
Axb your: tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force
Axb should probably read:
Axb tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM net domains_only autolearn_force
Axb etc, etc - and not in user_
Axb iirc, this will also influence Bayes's scoring/learning
Axb
bayes_auto_learn_on_error 0
[snip]
tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force
tflags URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn_force
tflags URIBL_BLACK autolearn_force
tflags INVALID_DATE autolearn_force
Nonetheless:
X-Spam-Score: 6.9
X-Spam-Tests: BAYES_99=3.5,BAYES_999=0.2,HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MIME_HTML_ONLY
So, now I am really confused. I think I did everything right in
user_prefs:
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -2.00
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 6.00
bayes_auto_learn_on_error 0
[snip]
tflags URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn_force
tflags URIBL_JP_SURBL
On Wed, 21 May 2014 21:34:23 -0700
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I don't understand this setting, and reading the documentation doesn't
help.
It seems it sould make bayes learn spam whenever the total score
surpasses the value of bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam, and not
require 3 points from header
On Thu, 22 May 2014 15:54:42 +0100
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
Ian I don't understand this setting, and reading the documentation
Ian doesn't help.
Ian It seems it should make Bayes learn spam whenever the total score
Ian surpasses the value of bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam, and not
I don't understand this setting, and reading the documentation doesn't
help.
It seems it sould make bayes learn spam whenever the total score
surpasses the value of bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam, and not require
3 points from header and body each; that would make it a global setting
similar in
16 matches
Mail list logo