Matt Kettler wrote:
When compared to someone using zone transfers, it's still likely to be
marginally faster because the Ip::Country::Fast code and database are
both optimized for doing this kind of query very quickly.
You're right - I ran some tests, and Ip::Country::Fast is not just
Matt Kettler wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
It doesn't as far as the rejected mail goes - but it does matter wrt
the usefulness of blackholes.us. Which is all I'm asking about.
True. Although this is the SpamAssassin mailing list, so, within
context of scored systems, the blackholes.us might
Per Jessen wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
It doesn't as far as the rejected mail goes - but it does matter wrt
the usefulness of blackholes.us. Which is all I'm asking about.
True. Although this is the SpamAssassin mailing list, so, within
context
Matt Kettler wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
True. Although this is the SpamAssassin mailing list, so, within
context of scored systems, the blackholes.us might be of some use.
That said, if you're using SA, it's much lighter weight to use the
RelayCountries plugin.
That seems hard to believe
Matt Kettler wrote:
That's easily checked - we could run a comparison of any up-to-date
geoip database against blackholes.us.
True.
Well, I've answered my own question. I ran a test of maxmind addresses
dated 2007/04/04 against the blackholes.us data dated 2006/05/24. The
maxmind database
Per Jessen wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
That's easily checked - we could run a comparison of any up-to-date
geoip database against blackholes.us.
True.
Well, I've answered my own question. I ran a test of maxmind addresses
dated 2007/04/04 against the blackholes.us data
Per Jessen wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
That's easily checked - we could run a comparison of any up-to-date
geoip database against blackholes.us.
True.
Well, I've answered my own question. I ran a test of maxmind addresses
dated 2007/04/04 against the blackholes.us data
Does anyone have a current status for blackholes.us ? The rsync'ed data
is about 18months old.
I had an email rejected earlier today due to a server
being blacklisted by germany.blackholes.us
/Per Jessen, Zürich
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Per Jessen wrote:
Does anyone have a current status for blackholes.us ? The rsync'ed data
is about 18months old.
I had an email rejected earlier today due to a server
being blacklisted by germany.blackholes.us
Well, if the MTA is in Germany, the DNSBL isn't
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Per Jessen wrote:
Does anyone have a current status for blackholes.us ? The rsync'ed
data is about 18months old.
I had an email rejected earlier today due to a server
being blacklisted by germany.blackholes.us
Well, if the MTA
Per Jessen wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Per Jessen wrote:
Does anyone have a current status for blackholes.us ? The rsync'ed
data is about 18months old.
I had an email rejected earlier today due to a server
being blacklisted by germany.blackholes.us
Well
John Rudd wrote:
The server is in Germany - anyway, I can't be bothered to deal with a
mailadmin who rejects based on blackholes.us ... I just curious given
the staleness of the data.
If the server is in Germany, then I don't see how staleness of the
data matters.
It doesn't as far
Per Jessen wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
The server is in Germany - anyway, I can't be bothered to deal with a
mailadmin who rejects based on blackholes.us ... I just curious given
the staleness of the data.
If the server is in Germany, then I don't see how staleness of the
data
Hi All:
These days, I found that many outbond messages of my server were blocked
by blackholes.us. I checked all my IPs and found so many of them listed
in this list.
There are many email servers use the list as rbl straitly, Although it
says: Blackholes.us does not list spammers, spam
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 22:15, Xueron Nee wrote:
Hi All:
These days, I found that many outbond messages of my server were blocked
by blackholes.us. I checked all my IPs and found so many of them listed
in this list.
There are many email servers use the list as rbl straitly, Although
of my server were blocked
by blackholes.us. I checked all my IPs and found so many of them listed
in this list.
There are many email servers use the list as rbl straitly, Although it
says: Blackholes.us does not list spammers, spam supporters, or
vulernable hosts (open relays/proxies
blocked by
china.blackholes.us
Any good way to resolve this problem?
Thanks!
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 8/31/2006 8:15 AM, Xueron Nee wrote:
Hi All:
These days, I found that many outbond messages of my server were blocked
by blackholes.us. I checked all my IPs and found so many
On Thursday 31 August 2006 08:49, Xueron Nee wrote:
I don't know why njabl.org alse use these data.
http://njabl.org/cgi-bin/lookup.cgi?query=220.181.13.1
220.181.13.1 is listed in blackholes.njabl.org: China blocked by
china.blackholes.us
Don't have an IP address in Chinese netspace.
Xueron Nee wrote:
Hi All:
These days, I found that many outbond messages of my server were blocked
by blackholes.us. I checked all my IPs and found so many of them listed
in this list.
There are many email servers use the list as rbl straitly, Although it
says: Blackholes.us does not list
Dear Matt Kettler,
Thanks for your kindly help :)
Seems that there are too many email servers use these dns based lists
incorrectly ...
Matt Kettler wrote:
Xueron Nee wrote:
Hi All:
These days, I found that many outbond messages of my server were blocked
by blackholes.us. I checked
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Xueron Nee wrote:
Seems that there are too many email servers use these dns based
lists incorrectly ...
Not necessarily. An email admin has to make the conscious decision I
don't want to accept any email from China in order to use that RBL in
the first place.
I did
Dear John D. Hardin,
aha, that sounds reasonable :)
But the fact is that some server blocked me, but it should accepted. My
users complained about this and made me so agonising
Thanks for your helo anyway.
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Xueron Nee wrote:
Seems that there
: Re: RBL and blackholes.us.
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Xueron Nee wrote:
Seems that there are too many email servers use these dns based
lists incorrectly ...
Not necessarily. An email admin has to make the conscious
decision I
don't want to accept any email
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Xueron Nee wrote:
Dear John D. Hardin,
aha, that sounds reasonable :)
But the fact is that some server blocked me, but it should accepted. My
users complained about this and made me so agonising
I suggest you contact the admin of that mailserver and ask them to
For the last couple of days my SA wasn't able to use korea.blackholes.us.
I tried to ping it but it seems dead. Anyone knows the reason and
if/when it's coming back?
Thanks,
Eddy
I had the same problem with all the blackholes.us domain and
complained about it some time ago. I googled the issue and found out
that a year ago it was under a DDOS attack
(http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/2004-September/020794.html)
perhaps it's been happening again.
There should be many
I think it's down. I can't browse to their web site and can't even
ping to blackholes.us (216.243.118.34).
On 8/13/05, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ilan Aisic wrote:
For the last couple of days my SA wasn't able to use blackholes.us.
I tried to ping it but it seems dead. Anyone knows
For the last couple of days my SA wasn't able to use blackholes.us.
I tried to ping it but it seems dead. Anyone knows the reason and
if/when it's coming back?
--
Ilan Aisic
Registered Linux User 8124 http://counter.li.org
Ilan Aisic wrote:
For the last couple of days my SA wasn't able to use blackholes.us.
I tried to ping it but it seems dead. Anyone knows the reason and
if/when it's coming back?
This is probably a timeout issue. works (slow but works) from here.
BTW, the web page says 29 March, 2005. does
29 matches
Mail list logo
