On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
and maybe some other blackhole lists.
why?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
On Monday 21 January 2008 12:29, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
and maybe some other blackhole lists.
why?
On Monday 21 January 2008 12:29, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 18.01.08 13:24, Stefan Jakobs wrote:
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
and maybe some other blackhole lists.
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to disable
all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl and maybe
some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out the corresponding header lines in the files
20_dnsbl_tests.cf and
On Friday 18 January 2008 13:46, you wrote:
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to
disable all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl
and maybe some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to disable
all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl and maybe
some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out the corresponding header lines in the files
Stefan Jakobs wrote:
Hello list,
I'm using amavisd-new with spamassassin and for some tests I have to disable
all network tests in spamassassin except for sorbs, njabl, uribl and maybe
some other blackhole lists.
I guess I can comment out the corresponding header lines in the files
